Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Christiane Hunt

Retina Specialist Columbus, OH Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1144483561 CMS profile 1079167

262 Neil Ave, Suite 220, Columbus, OH 43215

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,432

151 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Christiane Hunt of Columbus, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,432 across 151 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 61st percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,154 43
2024 General $1,373 52
2023 General $884 29
2022 General $387 15
2021 General $152 3
2020 General $17 1
2019 General $465 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Christiane Hunt
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Christiane Hunt were reported at $1,154. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Christiane Hunt Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $465 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $17 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $152 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $387 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $884 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $1,373 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $1,154 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,683 51 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $836 40 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $378 9 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $304 14 payments
  5. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $289 12 payments
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $240 2 payments
  7. Dutch Ophthalmic, USA $177 1 payment
  8. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $139 5 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $113 1 payment
  10. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $110 7 payments
  11. Other $163 9 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,432 151 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EYLEA HD $1,100 37 payments
  2. VABYSMO $691 39 payments
  3. EYLEA $614 15 payments
  4. OZURDEX $287 13 payments
  5. Syfovre $272 11 payments
  6. Izervay $252 5 payments
  7. TEPEZZA $240 2 payments
  8. EVA Ophthalmic Surgical System $177 1 payment
  9. SUSVIMO $145 1 payment
  10. ILUVIEN $92 6 payments
  11. Other $413 21 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 10 drugs

Part D claims

462

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$9,172

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

24.2%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 176 $4,964
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 46 $1,049
Atropine Sulfate Generic 12 $611
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 13 $520
Ofloxacin Generic 53 $465
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 39 $439
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 40 $395
Erythromycin Erythromycin Base Brand 33 $352
Ciprofloxacin Hcl Generic 39 $330
Latanoprost Generic 11 $47

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,670,367

Of which drugs: $2,230,997

Medicare patients

749

Average age 77

Services billed

21,828

434 women, 315 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 43%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 23%
Heart failure 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 205 2,022 $1,327,266
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 50 1,544 $407,745
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 34 10,680 $293,523
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 12 1,020 $119,161
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 17 80 $58

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $625
$625 — 1,544
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $252
$252 — 10,680
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $183
$183 — —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $104
$104 — —
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $100
$100 — 1,020

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

151 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record