Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Chi Shum

Internal Medicine New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1033143003 CMS profile 274133

210 E 47Th St, Apt 1A, New York, NY 10017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$32,780

1,541 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Chi Shum of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $32,780 across 1,541 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,272 178
2024 General $5,795 218
2023 General $5,588 221
2022 General $4,300 234
2021 General $4,369 269
2020 General $4,335 224
2019 General $3,121 197

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Chi Shum
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Chi Shum were reported at $5,272. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Chi Shum Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,121 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $4,335 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,369 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $4,300 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $5,588 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $5,795 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $5,272 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $4,306 156 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $3,828 199 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $3,739 177 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,741 125 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,613 70 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $1,442 56 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,209 92 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,124 60 payments
  9. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,103 18 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $992 41 payments
  11. Other $10,684 547 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $31,242 1,535 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $800 1 payment
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $527 2 payments
  4. Honoraria $198 1 payment
  5. Education $13 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,997 135 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,705 110 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,591 91 payments
  4. FARXIGA $1,587 53 payments
  5. UBRELVY $1,557 64 payments
  6. BREZTRI $1,230 27 payments
  7. XIFAXAN $1,209 92 payments
  8. Wegovy $1,193 24 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $1,125 56 payments
  10. QELBREE $1,103 18 payments
  11. Other $26,239 1,262 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,002

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$25,741

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

13.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 12 $8,471
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 15 $6,172
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 36 $1,601
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 44 $1,553
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 15 $814
Omeprazole Generic 55 $744
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 73 $607
Losartan Potassium Generic 48 $513
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 22 $424
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 72 $385

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$52,365

Of which drugs: $44

Medicare patients

88

Average age 71

Services billed

1,192

46 women, 42 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Cancer 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 14 50 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 44 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Wegovy
$475 — —
JARDIANCE
$447 — —
UBRELVY
$333 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$266 12 —
AIRSUPRA
$256 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 44 with Patron

Records

1,541 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record