Nurse Practitioner Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Cheryl Jacques

Nurse Practitioner Norwich, CT Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1700939998 CMS profile 11144316

401 West Thames Street, Southeastern Mental Health Authority, Norwich, CT 06360

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29

1 record reported · program year 2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Cheryl Jacques of Norwich, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 10th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $29 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Cheryl Jacques
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Cheryl Jacques were reported at $0. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Cheryl Jacques Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $0 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $0 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $0 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $29 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $0 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2024
  1. Braeburn Inc. $29 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2024
  1. Food and Beverage $29 1 payment
Products named General payments · program year 2024
  1. BRIXADI $29 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

936

Median for Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist: 344

Drug cost

$112,456

Median for Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist: $20,739

Branded share of claims

31.3%

Median for Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist: 20.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Invega Sustenna Paliperidone Palmitate Brand 19 $64,411
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 61 $11,705
Risperdal Consta Risperidone Microspheres Brand 17 $10,815
Paliperidone Er Paliperidone Brand 18 $6,054
Divalproex Sodium Er Divalproex Sodium Brand 19 $1,931
Olanzapine Generic 19 $1,798
Clorazepate Dipotassium Generic 12 $1,680
Bupropion Xl Bupropion Hcl Brand 66 $1,627
Gabapentin Generic 47 $1,206
Prazosin Hcl Generic 32 $1,178

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,644 Part D prescribers listed as Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BRIXADI
  • Braeburn Inc. $29
$29 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

1 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record