Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Tate

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology St George, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1376583526 CMS profile 62719

1380 E Medical Center Dr, Ste 1500, St George, UT 84790

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,768

266 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Charles Tate of St George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,768 across 266 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 38th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,952 53
2024 General $1,142 33
2023 General $2,770 50
2022 General $2,341 52
2021 General $513 19
2020 General $525 27
2019 General $524 32

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Tate
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Tate were reported at $3,952. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Charles Tate Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $524 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $525 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $513 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $2,341 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $2,770 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $1,142 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $3,952 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biosense Webster, Inc. $3,662 76 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,576 74 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $2,295 25 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $1,312 40 payments
  5. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $874 11 payments
  6. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $253 8 payments
  7. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $191 11 payments
  8. Atricure, Inc. $165 2 payments
  9. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $165 10 payments
  10. Cardiva Medical, Inc. $108 1 payment
  11. Other $169 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,970 258 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,798 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Carto 3 $2,987 56 payments
  2. EVERA MRI XT DR SURESCAN $1,142 6 payments
  3. OPTIMIZER Cardiovascular Device $874 11 payments
  4. OPTIMIZER Cardiovascular Device $874 11 payments
  5. WATCHMAN Access System $682 16 payments
  6. LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor $413 7 payments
  7. Micra $364 6 payments
  8. AURORA EV-ICD MRI SURESCAN $361 5 payments
  9. QDOT MICRO Catheter $262 2 payments
  10. ENSITE PRECISION $259 2 payments
  11. Other $4,324 155 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

357

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$59,164

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

37.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 69 $55,933
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 13 $929
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 78 $767
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 43 $398
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 16 $208
Losartan Potassium Generic 24 $194
Flecainide Acetate Generic 13 $154
Lisinopril Generic 17 $124
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 17 $114
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Bisulfate Brand 23 $113

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$158,883

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

438

Average age 77

Services billed

1,609

202 women, 236 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 68%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Heart failure 39%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 25%
Depression 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $37
$37 — —
VYNDAQEL
  • PFIZER INC. $24
$24 — —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

266 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record