Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Pewitt

Family Medicine Jackson, MO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1740389980 CMS profile 78600

2387 W Jackson Blvd, Jackson, MO 63755

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,593

1,404 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Charles Pewitt of Jackson, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,593 across 1,404 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,741 137
2024 General $2,452 141
2023 General $3,312 200
2022 General $3,883 232
2021 General $3,964 263
2020 General $3,060 226
2019 General $3,182 205

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Pewitt
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Pewitt were reported at $2,741. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Charles Pewitt Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,182 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $3,060 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $3,964 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $3,883 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $3,312 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,452 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,741 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,924 281 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,283 96 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,353 88 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,224 96 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,160 75 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,056 70 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $974 54 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $858 44 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $807 56 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $713 60 payments
  11. Other $7,241 484 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,556 1,400 payments
  2. Education $38 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $2,578 142 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,134 89 payments
  3. BREZTRI $1,115 42 payments
  4. FARXIGA $1,105 37 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,098 69 payments
  6. QULIPTA $999 45 payments
  7. XARELTO $866 57 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $849 70 payments
  9. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $721 63 payments
  10. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $670 34 payments
  11. Other $18,172 1,193 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 229 drugs

Part D claims

20,677

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,140,973

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 178 $137,937
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 131 $106,966
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 107 $87,413
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 70 $54,706
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 40 $44,039
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 46 $42,794
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 39 $42,585
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 29 $38,265
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 51 $35,735
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 32 $30,702

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 229 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$444,458

Of which drugs: $19,723

Medicare patients

407

Average age 74

Services billed

24,849

186 women, 221 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 38%
Arthritis 35%
Depression 29%
COPD 27%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for pneumococcal polysaccharide for injection beneath the skin or into muscle, patient 2 years or older 90732 Office 80 80 $10,202
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 189 189 $6,825
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 133 15,200 $1,511
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 73 92 $530
Injection, lincomycin hcl, up to 300 mg J2010 Office 22 32 $233
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 37 126 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$300 — —
VRAYLAR
$280 29 —
FARXIGA
$161 107 —
Auvelity
$150 — —
UBRELVY
$143 17 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

1,404 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record