Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Moore

Urology Hattiesburg, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1801058821 CMS profile 217669

139 Fairfield Dr, Hattiesburg, MS 39402

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,826

356 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Charles Moore of Hattiesburg, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,826 across 356 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $685 34
2024 General $934 46
2023 General $889 53
2022 General $722 53
2021 General $928 61
2020 General $581 38
2019 General $1,087 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Moore
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Moore were reported at $685. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Charles Moore Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,087 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $581 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $928 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $722 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $889 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $934 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $685 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Astellas Pharma US Inc $740 42 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $666 51 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $634 42 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $530 46 payments
  5. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $495 19 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $482 32 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $454 28 payments
  8. Coloplast Corp $340 13 payments
  9. Ethicon US, LLC $178 7 payments
  10. Urogen Pharma, Inc. $111 6 payments
  11. Other $1,195 70 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,811 354 payments
  2. Education $15 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XTANDI $854 51 payments
  2. ERLEADA $660 45 payments
  3. GEMTESA $554 23 payments
  4. Nubeqa $482 32 payments
  5. BOTOX $405 31 payments
  6. Xofigo $395 25 payments
  7. MYRBETRIQ $341 19 payments
  8. Titan $250 8 payments
  9. ORGOVYX $248 15 payments
  10. STRATTICE RECONSTRUCTIVE TISSUE MATRIX BPS $226 14 payments
  11. Other $2,289 150 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

2,699

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$290,174

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

22.2%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 11 $145,074
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 119 $71,491
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 49 $36,963
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 935 $10,557
Finasteride Generic 522 $4,836
Bethanechol Chloride Generic 74 $4,176
Testosterone Cypionate Generic 55 $4,039
Silodosin Generic 43 $1,891
Trimethoprim Generic 12 $1,627
Oxybutynin Chloride Generic 136 $1,493

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 97 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$201,347

Of which drugs: $44,259

Medicare patients

702

Average age 74

Services billed

10,579

128 women, 574 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 34%
Cancer 26%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Depression 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 30 276 $38,225
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 42 4,400 $422

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $218
$218 49 —
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $67
$67 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $49
$49 — —
Nubeqa
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $42
$42 — —
Xofigo
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $42
$42 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

356 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record