Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Lindzy

Pain Medicine Fort Wayne, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1245449172 CMS profile 968330

14104 Peddlers Ford, Ste 7, Fort Wayne, IN 46814

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,995

113 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Charles Lindzy of Fort Wayne, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,995 across 113 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 55th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $833 31
2024 General $444 10
2023 General $294 11
2022 General $711 20
2021 General $233 13
2020 General $283 19
2019 General $196 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Lindzy
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Lindzy were reported at $833. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Charles Lindzy Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $196 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $283 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $233 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $711 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $294 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $444 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $833 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $909 23 payments
  2. Stimwave Technologies Incorporated $389 4 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $364 10 payments
  4. Medtronic USA, Inc. $363 21 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $260 12 payments
  6. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $258 15 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $106 6 payments
  8. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $79 5 payments
  9. Almatica Pharma LLC $41 3 payments
  10. Virtus Pharmaceuticals LLC $40 3 payments
  11. Other $185 11 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,812 109 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $159 2 payments
  3. Education $24 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INCEPTIV $404 7 payments
  2. StimQ Freedom-8A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $389 4 payments
  3. StimQ Receiver Stimulator Kit Channel A US w/Receiver $389 4 payments
  4. Freedom-4A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $389 4 payments
  5. Freedom-8A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $389 4 payments
  6. StimQ Freedom-4A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $389 4 payments
  7. UBRELVY $364 10 payments
  8. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $360 6 payments
  9. RESTORE $281 10 payments
  10. BELBUCA $140 8 payments
  11. Other $1,327 83 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 51 drugs

Part D claims

5,854

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$313,583

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

30.4%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Levorphanol Tartrate Generic 12 $65,282
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 67 $46,069
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 31 $28,394
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 615 $26,115
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 748 $24,850
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 17 $19,994
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 13 $13,652
Lyrica Pregabalin Brand 14 $12,592
Gabapentin Generic 884 $10,880
Fentanyl Generic 100 $9,692

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 51 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$153,032

Of which drugs: $296

Medicare patients

126

Average age 69

Services billed

5,652

73 women, 53 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 68%
Diabetes 36%
Depression 35%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
COPD 20%
Osteoporosis 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 21 144 $103
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 37 1,090 $96
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 12 520 $54
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 42 90 $25

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $144
$144 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $56
$56 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $31
$31 67 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 17 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $19
$19 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

113 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record