Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Hill

Internal Medicine Oxford, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1871600189 CMS profile 85221

551 Azalea Dr, Oxford, MS 38655

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,267

1,064 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Charles Hill of Oxford, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,267 across 1,064 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,403 151
2024 General $2,067 133
2023 General $2,350 159
2022 General $2,405 177
2021 General $2,472 175
2020 General $1,548 117
2019 General $2,022 152

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Hill
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Hill were reported at $2,403. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Charles Hill Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,022 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,548 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,472 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,405 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,350 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,067 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,403 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,682 127 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,546 106 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,490 82 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,316 112 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,144 97 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,004 79 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $689 51 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $664 54 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $607 41 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $591 23 payments
  11. Other $4,534 292 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,942 1,056 payments
  2. Education $325 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,121 59 payments
  2. Ozempic $972 67 payments
  3. UBRELVY $949 63 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $728 48 payments
  5. ELIQUIS $695 66 payments
  6. QULIPTA $628 43 payments
  7. JARDIANCE Diabetes $620 63 payments
  8. JARDIANCE Diabetes $614 45 payments
  9. XARELTO $605 50 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $560 39 payments
  11. Other $12,987 933 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 213 drugs

Part D claims

22,910

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,873,390

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 251 $254,441
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 209 $170,433
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 219 $161,996
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 192 $143,132
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 124 $92,644
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 100 $71,652
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 101 $70,124
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 67 $57,336
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 47 $46,304
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 48 $44,617

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 213 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 120 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,112,668

Of which drugs: $614,717

Medicare patients

1,437

Average age 76

Services billed

73,802

813 women, 624 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Depression 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Osteoporosis 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, inclisiran, 1 mg J1306 Office 55 27,548 $262,092
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 137 11,820 $236,175
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 429 432 $35,113
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 82 82 $23,840
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 20 93 $83
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 11 38 $19

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
$188 192 —
UBRELVY
$181 — —
QULIPTA
$103 — —
MOUNJARO
$100 47 —
JARDIANCE
$98 219 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,064 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record