Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Cook

Internal Medicine Raleigh, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1699735654 CMS profile 31425

3372 Six Forks Rd, Raleigh, NC 27609

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$227,640

946 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$10,226 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Charles Cook of Raleigh, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $227,640 across 946 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $10,226 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $41,004 76
2024 General $52,467 94
2023 General $6,634 53
2022 General $3,907 87
2021 General $18,890 123
2020 General $26,566 140
2019 General $78,172 373

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Cook
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Cook were reported at $41,004. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Charles Cook Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $78,172 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $26,566 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $18,890 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,907 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $6,634 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $52,467 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $41,004 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $99,759 161 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $64,329 129 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $31,915 40 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $11,789 36 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $7,044 47 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,679 75 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,945 21 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk AS $1,509 4 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,373 94 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $993 69 payments
  11. Other $4,304 270 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $197,285 152 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,340 720 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $10,087 60 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $5,980 3 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,620 1 payment
  6. Education $329 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $99,441 136 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $32,438 44 payments
  3. ENTRESTO $31,900 39 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $31,661 70 payments
  5. LINZESS $18,657 67 payments
  6. FARXIGA $2,074 41 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA $1,932 20 payments
  8. VIBERZI $1,812 4 payments
  9. Ozempic $806 49 payments
  10. Repatha $617 45 payments
  11. Other $8,759 603 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 160 drugs

Part D claims

8,203

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$1,122,402

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

27.3%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vyndamax Tafamidis Brand 13 $290,476
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 87 $109,152
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 72 $65,954
Janumet Xr Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 80 $55,396
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 39 $53,008
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 67 $48,738
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 38 $39,821
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 30 $29,038
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 29 $28,880
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 25 $27,187

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 160 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$48,505

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

148

Average age 71

Services billed

827

73 women, 75 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 38%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Cancer 18%
Heart failure 13%
Depression 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $30,380
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $21,457
$51,837 72 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $130
$130 87 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $86
$86 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $46
$46 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $46
$46 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

946 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record