Medical Doctor Program year 2022 Reported 2019–2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Andrews

Internal Medicine Newport Beach, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1750345955 CMS profile 79449

20311 Sw Acacia St Ste 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,119

375 records reported · program years 2019–2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, Charles Andrews of Newport Beach, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,119 across 375 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $625 29
2021 General $1,728 93
2020 General $2,220 128
2019 General $1,545 125

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Andrews
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Andrews were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Charles Andrews Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,545 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,220 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,728 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $625 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $0 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,371 116 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $665 38 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $491 27 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $489 32 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $450 20 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $436 18 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $286 14 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $268 18 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $229 11 payments
  10. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. $190 8 payments
  11. Other $1,243 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Food and Beverage $6,095 372 payments
  2. Education $23 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Ozempic $807 72 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $534 28 payments
  3. JARDIANCE $426 19 payments
  4. Saxenda $414 31 payments
  5. TRULICITY $324 20 payments
  6. COLOGUARD $308 22 payments
  7. FARXIGA $274 16 payments
  8. XARELTO $262 17 payments
  9. Repatha $262 10 payments
  10. EUCRISA $226 18 payments
  11. Other $4,795 267 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

375 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record