Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Chaewon Song

Geriatric Medicine Garden Grove, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1972589687 CMS profile 316254

12665 Garden Grove Blvd, Suite 503, Garden Grove, CA 92843

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,036

1,037 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Chaewon Song of Garden Grove, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,036 across 1,037 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Geriatric Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,099 99
2024 General $2,334 115
2023 General $2,697 126
2022 General $3,205 159
2021 General $4,116 200
2020 General $2,914 157
2019 General $3,671 181

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Chaewon Song
  • Geriatric Medicine median
  • Middle half of Geriatric Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Chaewon Song were reported at $2,099. Among 1,028 Geriatric Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $123 and the middle half received between $35 and $408.

Show as a table
Year Chaewon Song Geriatric Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,671 $122 $40–$435 $163
2020 $2,914 $98 $25–$349 $114
2021 $4,116 $125 $34–$441 $132
2022 $3,205 $124 $36–$408 $149
2023 $2,697 $121 $41–$383 $160
2024 $2,334 $134 $41–$435 $164
2025 $2,099 $123 $35–$408 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,342 172 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,899 90 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,590 77 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,310 59 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,043 49 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,017 51 payments
  7. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $940 39 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $839 43 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $825 33 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $780 24 payments
  11. Other $8,452 400 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,739 1,029 payments
  2. Education $297 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CREON $1,971 144 payments
  2. LINZESS $1,736 118 payments
  3. ZENPEP $1,695 71 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,408 67 payments
  5. Ozempic $1,315 72 payments
  6. ELIQUIS $1,032 47 payments
  7. ENTRESTO $813 40 payments
  8. XARELTO $708 35 payments
  9. TRULICITY $669 35 payments
  10. EVENITY $649 30 payments
  11. Other $15,296 745 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 264 drugs

Part D claims

37,379

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$4,378,106

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 927 $822,233
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 318 $398,637
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 501 $356,235
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 878 $350,745
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 436 $230,299
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 193 $186,538
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 311 $184,254
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 286 $171,253
Prolia Denosumab Brand 92 $153,483
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 222 $132,815

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 264 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$480,590

Of which drugs: $3,143

Medicare patients

787

Average age 85

Services billed

7,531

549 women, 238 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 58%
Diabetes 55%
Alzheimer's or dementia 52%
Heart failure 48%
Osteoporosis 45%
Depression 42%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 17 17 $1,381
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 23 32 $29
5% dextrose/normal saline (500 ml = 1 unit) J7042 Office 16 22 $22
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 13 59 $5

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CREON
$252 927 —
IBSRELA
$230 — —
LINZESS
$213 222 —
REXULTI
$205 — —
ZENPEP
$155 318 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

1,037 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Geriatric Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record