Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Chad Wagoner

Family Medicine Carthage, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1871582130 CMS profile 85357

1615 Hazel St, Carthage, MO 64836

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,124

1,085 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Chad Wagoner of Carthage, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,124 across 1,085 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,549 144
2024 General $2,916 175
2023 General $2,842 175
2022 General $2,593 168
2021 General $2,918 198
2020 General $1,390 92
2019 General $1,915 133

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Chad Wagoner
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Chad Wagoner were reported at $2,549. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Chad Wagoner Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,915 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,390 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,918 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,593 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,842 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,916 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,549 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,440 121 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,518 116 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,391 99 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,293 92 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,142 77 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,022 77 payments
  7. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $861 53 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $767 48 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $744 50 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $649 44 payments
  11. Other $5,296 308 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,109 1,082 payments
  2. Education $14 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BREZTRI $1,407 62 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,023 42 payments
  3. TRINTELLIX $799 49 payments
  4. Ozempic $784 54 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $724 50 payments
  6. XARELTO $595 39 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $575 41 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $561 36 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $560 41 payments
  10. TRULICITY $536 40 payments
  11. Other $16,202 1,061 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 159 drugs

Part D claims

12,947

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,185,013

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 155 $141,133
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 174 $125,179
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 136 $103,298
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 68 $85,296
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 64 $78,760
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 13 $57,834
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 53 $53,925
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 49 $52,424
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 68 $50,950
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 78 $50,748

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 159 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$180,390

Of which drugs: $47,871

Medicare patients

428

Average age 75

Services billed

5,422

237 women, 191 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 39%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Depression 21%
Heart failure 19%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 1,380 $28,187
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 102 106 $8,574

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BREZTRI
$342 11 —
MOUNJARO
$175 — —
FARXIGA
$129 174 —
REXULTI
$123 68 —
TRINTELLIX
$105 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

1,085 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record