Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Chad Hammett

General Practice Beaumont, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1083731756 CMS profile 139732

755 N. 11Th Street, Suite P5200, Beaumont, TX 77702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,285

445 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Chad Hammett of Beaumont, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,285 across 445 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,064 60
2024 General $810 46
2023 General $1,927 109
2022 General $1,416 88
2021 General $1,370 93
2020 General $549 37
2019 General $148 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Chad Hammett
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Chad Hammett were reported at $1,064. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Chad Hammett General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $148 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $549 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $1,370 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $1,416 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $1,927 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $810 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $1,064 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,695 120 payments
  2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $547 28 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $542 30 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $359 20 payments
  5. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $338 24 payments
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $307 23 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $246 15 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $245 10 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $221 16 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $179 10 payments
  11. Other $2,606 149 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,254 442 payments
  2. Education $31 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QULIPTA $918 58 payments
  2. UBRELVY $720 50 payments
  3. Kerendia $547 28 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $314 16 payments
  5. Vascepa $307 23 payments
  6. APTIOM $284 17 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $253 14 payments
  8. TRINTELLIX $245 10 payments
  9. SHINGRIX $208 11 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $189 18 payments
  11. Other $5,211 314 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 300 drugs

Part D claims

29,312

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$2,088,434

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

22.5%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 616 $294,629
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 138 $150,560
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 473 $129,749
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 113 $95,352
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 50 $74,342
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 132 $72,686
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 55 $67,825
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 151 $67,370
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 84 $58,971
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 20 $49,712

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 300 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 101 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$236,766

Of which drugs: $6,983

Medicare patients

584

Average age 75

Services billed

9,029

327 women, 257 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 43%
Diabetes 37%
Depression 34%
Heart failure 29%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
COPD 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 55 55 $4,500
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 34 250 $131
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 15 19 $80
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 62 695 $57
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 60 95 $10
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 16 18 $6

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $114
$114 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $96
$96 — —
Auvelity
  • Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $94
$94 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $84
$84 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $46
$46 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

445 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record