Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Cecile Becker

Neurology Springfield, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1750493540 CMS profile 170298

800 N. 1St Street, Springfield, IL 62702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,721

725 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$52,075

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$29,232 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Cecile Becker of Springfield, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,721 across 725 general payments and $52,075 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $29,232 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,377 74
2024 General $1,837 98
2024 Research $52,075 2
2023 General $1,684 112
2022 General $4,077 122
2021 General $7,120 154
2020 General $8,687 101
2019 General $939 64

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Cecile Becker
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Cecile Becker were reported at $1,377. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Cecile Becker Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $939 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $8,687 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $7,120 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $4,077 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $1,684 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $1,837 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $1,377 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $9,976 203 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $8,602 85 payments
  3. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,076 80 payments
  4. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $725 14 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $673 70 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $642 77 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $486 26 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $468 33 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $359 10 payments
  10. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $306 19 payments
  11. Other $2,407 108 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $13,250 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $10,717 707 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,234 4 payments
  4. Education $520 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $7,552 35 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $7,073 138 payments
  3. QULIPTA $3,917 113 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT $913 92 payments
  5. BOTOX $724 51 payments
  6. ZEPOSIA $652 76 payments
  7. ULTOMIRIS $499 10 payments
  8. Briviact $468 33 payments
  9. AJOVY $437 37 payments
  10. EMGALITY $387 24 payments
  11. Other $4,258 203 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $52,075 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 66 drugs

Part D claims

3,954

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,494,832

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

29%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Soliris Eculizumab Brand 14 $734,737
Betaseron Interferon Beta-1b Brand 14 $131,407
Teriflunomide Generic 13 $76,479
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 46 $70,983
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 12 $59,940
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 28 $59,301
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 30 $51,530
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 34 $33,599
Lacosamide Generic 136 $31,151
Nourianz Istradefylline Brand 12 $22,202

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 66 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$787,582

Of which drugs: $677,173

Medicare patients

593

Average age 72

Services billed

50,135

350 women, 243 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
COPD 19%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 47 29,789 $144,944

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$351 19 —
ULTOMIRIS
$300 — —
QULIPTA
$259 11 —
ZEPOSIA
$228 — —
Austedo XR
$82 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

727 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record