Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Cecil Dodson

Internal Medicine Mountain Brk, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1750493482 CMS profile 34105

200 Office Park Dr, Suite 201, Mountain Brk, AL 35223

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,732

114 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Cecil Dodson of Mountain Brk, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,732 across 114 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $240 11
2024 General $512 18
2023 General $425 19
2022 General $397 17
2021 General $190 7
2020 General $674 19
2019 General $1,293 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Cecil Dodson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Cecil Dodson were reported at $240. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Cecil Dodson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,293 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $674 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $190 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $397 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $425 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $512 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $240 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $739 21 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $480 11 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $360 14 payments
  4. Amarin Pharma Inc. $344 10 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $322 10 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $286 10 payments
  7. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $239 8 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $211 7 payments
  9. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $207 7 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $131 2 payments
  11. Other $413 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,714 111 payments
  2. Education $18 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $354 12 payments
  2. FARXIGA $346 9 payments
  3. Kerendia $286 10 payments
  4. NEXLETOL $239 8 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $238 13 payments
  6. Otezla $224 13 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $211 7 payments
  8. Livalo $207 7 payments
  9. Vascepa $192 6 payments
  10. TRULICITY $185 7 payments
  11. Other $1,645 54 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 81 drugs

Part D claims

2,922

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$406,310

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 101 $82,685
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 56 $67,614
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 44 $59,058
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 44 $27,749
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 26 $22,976
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 16 $21,206
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 17 $17,859
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 14 $14,078
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 16 $12,982
Icosapent Ethyl Generic 44 $11,257

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 81 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$40,450

Of which drugs: $2,822

Medicare patients

111

Average age 80

Services billed

708

48 women, 63 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 68%
Atrial fibrillation 33%
Cancer 32%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 27%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 36 36 $2,822

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $130
$130 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $122
$122 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $110
$110 — —
NEXLETOL
  • Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $60
$60 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $34
$34 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

114 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record