Nurse Practitioner Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Cathleen Power

Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care Boston, MA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1346493673 CMS profile 10680119

44 Binney St, Dana 1234, Boston, MA 02115

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$246

7 records reported · program year 2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Cathleen Power of Boston, MA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $246 across 7 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 44th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $246 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Cathleen Power
  • Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Cathleen Power were reported at $0. Among 4,814 Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles paid that year, the median was $169 and the middle half received between $51 and $499.

Show as a table
Year Cathleen Power Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $0 $137 $39–$445 $132
2022 $0 $139 $44–$421 $149
2023 $246 $163 $53–$481 $160
2024 $0 $176 $54–$511 $164
2025 $0 $169 $51–$499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2023
  1. Baxter Healthcare $246 7 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2023
  1. Food and Beverage $246 7 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

698

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$6,616,164

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

67.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 359 $6,098,493
Lorbrena Lorlatinib Brand 15 $311,463
Gilotrif Afatinib Dimaleate Brand 12 $135,089
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 87 $67,600
Erlotinib Hcl Generic 13 $942
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 36 $505
Dexamethasone Generic 25 $318
Omeprazole Generic 15 $306
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 13 $299
Prochlorperazine Maleate Generic 21 $242

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Records

7 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record