Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Catherine Soller

Nurse Practitioner Albuquerque, NM Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1528290558 CMS profile 11064083

7111 Prospect Pl Ne Ste B, Albuquerque, NM 87110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$33,147

535 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Catherine Soller of Albuquerque, NM is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,147 across 535 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,111 70
2024 General $2,139 65
2023 General $6,330 91
2022 General $15,708 189
2021 General $6,859 120

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Catherine Soller
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Catherine Soller were reported at $2,111. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Catherine Soller Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $6,859 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $15,708 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $6,330 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $2,139 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $2,111 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $17,696 128 payments
  2. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $8,232 23 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,352 61 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,137 60 payments
  5. Dexcom, Inc. $709 39 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $700 31 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $658 28 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $400 23 payments
  9. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $319 23 payments
  10. Insulet Corporation $316 26 payments
  11. Other $1,629 93 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $21,904 31 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $9,781 493 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,430 8 payments
  4. Education $32 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $14,972 92 payments
  2. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $8,232 23 payments
  3. Ozempic $3,077 77 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $839 40 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $734 36 payments
  6. Kerendia $700 31 payments
  7. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $509 29 payments
  8. Wegovy $427 21 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $397 15 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $392 23 payments
  11. Other $4,876 279 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 77 drugs

Part D claims

3,979

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,503,675

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

57.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 355 $455,270
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 149 $159,518
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 131 $100,101
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 53 $80,030
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 52 $78,826
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 68 $70,148
Invokana Canagliflozin Brand 62 $70,078
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 43 $45,391
Victoza 3-Pak Liraglutide Brand 45 $41,513
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 45 $37,075

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 77 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$38,865

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

186

Average age 73

Services billed

621

127 women, 59 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Diabetes 62%
Arthritis 44%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Depression 19%
Osteoporosis 19%
Atrial fibrillation 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$269 149 —
MOUNJARO
$180 53 —
EVENITY
$108 — —
TEPEZZA
$105 — —
Wegovy
$74 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

535 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in New Mexico

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record