Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Catherine Roach

Dermatology Greenville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1295239770 CMS profile 11285041

5 Stevens St Ste 300, Greenville, SC 29605

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,509

179 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Catherine Roach of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,509 across 179 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 67th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,938 49
2024 General $1,255 55
2023 General $1,213 47
2022 General $993 23
2021 General $92 4
2020 General $19 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Catherine Roach
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Catherine Roach were reported at $1,938. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Catherine Roach Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $19 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $92 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $993 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,213 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,255 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,938 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $1,238 9 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,062 44 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $530 19 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $369 12 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $320 13 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $235 5 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $212 9 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $173 6 payments
  9. Merz North America, Inc. $134 1 payment
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $121 6 payments
  11. Other $1,116 55 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,282 175 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $975 1 payment
  3. Education $252 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Bimzelx $1,071 6 payments
  2. RINVOQ $658 25 payments
  3. TREMFYA $530 19 payments
  4. SOTYKTU $369 12 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Immunology $294 12 payments
  6. Otezla $235 5 payments
  7. ILUMYA $221 9 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $171 11 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $143 5 payments
  10. Xeomin $134 1 payment
  11. Other $1,877 88 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,329

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$64,455

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

2.4%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 11 $37,942
Ketoconazole Generic 332 $4,332
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 89 $4,118
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 56 $3,299
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 210 $2,157
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 64 $1,714
Fluocinonide Generic 53 $1,375
Fluorouracil Generic 15 $1,097
Tacrolimus Generic 13 $1,042
Fluocinolone Acetonide Fluocinolone/Shower Cap Brand 21 $958

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$182,821

Of which drugs: $14,251

Medicare patients

616

Average age 73

Services billed

4,164

436 women, 180 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 42%
Depression 22%
Osteoporosis 22%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 30 47 $14,204
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 42 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $254
$254 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $154
$154 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $143
$143 — —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $76
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $59
$135 11 —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $67
$67 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

179 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record