Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Casilda Balmaceda

Neurology New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1093751919 CMS profile 622040

710 W 168Th St, New York, NY 10032

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$147,702

1,530 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$9,565

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,665 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2022

Through program year 2025, Casilda Balmaceda of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $147,702 across 1,530 general payments and $9,565 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,665 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,969 252
2024 General $5,237 256
2023 General $4,390 188
2022 General $17,312 226
2021 General $29,050 222
2021 Research $9,565 1
2020 General $25,593 162
2019 General $61,152 224

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Casilda Balmaceda
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Casilda Balmaceda were reported at $4,969. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Casilda Balmaceda Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $61,152 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $25,593 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $29,050 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $17,312 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $4,390 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $5,237 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $4,969 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $68,595 65 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15,997 34 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $14,337 252 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $11,642 88 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $9,679 23 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $3,548 58 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $3,194 17 payments
  8. US WorldMeds, LLC $2,454 129 payments
  9. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $2,441 61 payments
  10. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $2,257 123 payments
  11. Other $13,558 680 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $108,896 72 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $30,996 1,434 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,455 17 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,345 2 payments
  5. Education $10 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AIMOVIG $68,705 71 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT $25,676 57 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $12,657 118 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $10,732 37 payments
  5. CYMBALTA $3,000 2 payments
  6. NOURIANZ $2,441 61 payments
  7. INFINITY $2,373 33 payments
  8. QULIPTA $2,273 111 payments
  9. RYTARY $1,518 78 payments
  10. Movantik $1,065 4 payments
  11. Other $18,598 1,030 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $9,565 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 145 drugs

Part D claims

37,413

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$3,827,857

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

16.3%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 704 $1,082,324
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 308 $357,485
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 205 $338,745
Apokyn Apomorphine Hcl Brand 14 $309,653
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 14 $261,343
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 12 $204,095
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 3,511 $157,943
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 253 $130,991
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 162 $123,422
Rebif Rebidose Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 11 $108,179

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 145 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$91,651

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

196

Average age 72

Services billed

785

148 women, 48 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 43%
Depression 25%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Alzheimer's or dementia 17%
Osteoporosis 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Apokyn
$868 14 —
REXULTI
$514 205 —
UBRELVY
$462 308 —
QULIPTA
$426 45 —
Briviact
$240 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

1,531 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record