Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Casey Page

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Knoxville, TN Medical Doctor

NPI 1215933577 CMS profile 100054

1450 Dowell Springs Blvd., Suite 300, Knoxville, TN 37909

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$81,951

756 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Casey Page of Knoxville, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $81,951 across 756 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $159 8
2024 General $2,241 121
2023 General $2,128 127
2022 General $11,357 168
2021 General $28,084 80
2020 General $12,733 66
2019 General $25,249 186

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Casey Page
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Casey Page were reported at $159. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Casey Page Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $25,249 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $12,733 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $28,084 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $11,357 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $2,128 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $2,241 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $159 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $55,663 162 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $9,689 26 payments
  3. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $7,483 30 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $962 63 payments
  5. Mannkind Corporation $651 36 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $628 39 payments
  7. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $610 37 payments
  8. Corcept Therapeutics $573 36 payments
  9. Dexcom, Inc. $533 24 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $515 33 payments
  11. Other $4,646 270 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $67,007 54 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $11,645 675 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,129 20 payments
  4. Education $170 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $36,070 76 payments
  2. Ozempic $13,063 70 payments
  3. STEGLATRO $9,678 25 payments
  4. t:slim X2 insulin pump $6,716 26 payments
  5. Tresiba $5,752 5 payments
  6. t-slim insulin pump $750 3 payments
  7. Korlym $573 36 payments
  8. Kerendia $450 35 payments
  9. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $422 20 payments
  10. AFREZZA $383 22 payments
  11. Other $8,921 562 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 118 drugs

Part D claims

5,808

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,452,652

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

38.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 249 $296,969
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 96 $139,775
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 103 $111,750
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 59 $99,525
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 80 $98,695
Nutropin Aq Nuspin Somatropin Brand 12 $92,336
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 113 $80,338
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 35 $47,355
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 48 $47,112
Humalog Kwikpen U-200 Insulin Lispro Brand 19 $42,270

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 118 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 64 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$272,423

Of which drugs: $119,582

Medicare patients

468

Average age 72

Services billed

13,554

318 women, 150 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 56%
Diabetes 47%
Osteoporosis 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Depression 23%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 55 5,760 $117,283

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TEPEZZA
$183 — —
TZIELD
$174 — —
Kerendia
$147 — —
RYBELSUS
$111 — —
Ozempic
$111 249 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

756 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record