Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Casey Long

Pain Medicine Montgomery, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1609284751 CMS profile 1234235

432 Saint Lukes Dr, Montgomery, AL 36117

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,037

563 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Casey Long of Montgomery, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,037 across 563 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $727 52
2024 General $1,083 63
2023 General $1,271 77
2022 General $2,130 139
2021 General $1,818 131
2020 General $794 42
2019 General $1,214 59

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Casey Long
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Casey Long were reported at $727. Among 757 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $470 and the middle half received between $146 and $1,462.

Show as a table
Year Casey Long Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,214 $506 $144–$1,566 $163
2020 $794 $315 $96–$934 $114
2021 $1,818 $452 $134–$1,237 $132
2022 $2,130 $475 $124–$1,407 $149
2023 $1,271 $480 $136–$1,384 $160
2024 $1,083 $521 $164–$1,511 $164
2025 $727 $470 $146–$1,462 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $717 56 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $714 11 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $676 61 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $628 39 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $585 37 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $456 35 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $377 18 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $375 25 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $364 32 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $361 23 payments
  11. Other $3,784 226 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,952 562 payments
  2. Education $85 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $664 8 payments
  2. Ozempic $499 32 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $486 31 payments
  4. RELISTOR $448 41 payments
  5. XARELTO $350 31 payments
  6. Repatha $330 21 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $313 18 payments
  8. AIMOVIG $297 17 payments
  9. Kerendia $291 17 payments
  10. Otezla $284 18 payments
  11. Other $7,914 521 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 164 drugs

Part D claims

14,719

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,337,590

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

32.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 162 $196,374
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 233 $150,431
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 123 $148,939
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 134 $98,056
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 314 $76,330
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 98 $58,910
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 76 $55,058
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 69 $53,773
Zubsolv Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 54 $43,051
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 18 $26,502

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 164 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,911

Of which drugs: $395

Medicare patients

134

Average age 68

Services billed

1,468

82 women, 52 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 58%
Diabetes 41%
COPD 40%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 24%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 19 156 $83
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 24 364 $31
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 14 27 $24
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 13 56 $19

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $73
$73 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $67
$67 31 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $60
$60 162 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $57
$57 — —
BRIXADI
  • Braeburn Inc. $55
$55 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

563 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record