Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Carol Stessman

Family Medicine Omaha, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1669583639 CMS profile 256583

10710 Fort St, Omaha, NE 68134

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,386

520 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Carol Stessman of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,386 across 520 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,278 72
2024 General $1,362 78
2023 General $1,539 91
2022 General $1,871 129
2021 General $1,261 89
2020 General $444 24
2019 General $631 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Carol Stessman
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Carol Stessman were reported at $1,278. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Carol Stessman Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $631 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $444 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,261 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,871 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,539 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,362 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,278 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,026 71 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $820 59 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $790 29 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $770 50 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $644 43 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $549 36 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $542 34 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $446 28 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $364 19 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $306 20 payments
  11. Other $2,129 131 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,386 520 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $549 36 payments
  2. Ozempic $539 34 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $500 32 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $457 31 payments
  5. UBRELVY $395 32 payments
  6. FARXIGA $379 15 payments
  7. REXULTI $364 19 payments
  8. QULIPTA $354 20 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $314 20 payments
  10. XARELTO $305 22 payments
  11. Other $7,737 482 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 116 drugs

Part D claims

5,981

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$483,444

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

25.4%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 128 $153,441
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 61 $54,005
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 63 $49,909
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 32 $36,570
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 29 $26,604
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 37 $23,015
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 15 $17,895
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 16 $11,770
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 13 $11,219
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 26 $11,195

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 116 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$106,153

Of which drugs: $35,391

Medicare patients

183

Average age 72

Services billed

3,087

153 women, 30 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 38%
Diabetes 19%
Depression 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Ischemic heart disease 15%
Cancer 13%
Atrial fibrillation 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 11 1,140 $22,813
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 24 24 $6,992
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 18 19 $2,757
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 30 30 $2,455

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $128
$128 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $124
$124 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $106
$106 128 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $106
$106 — —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $61
  • Lundbeck LLC $32
$93 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

520 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record