Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Carol Deane Benedict

Rheumatology Washington, DC Medical Doctor

NPI 1356575864 CMS profile 1142515

3800 Reservoir Rd Nw Suite 3004, Phc 3Rd Floor, Div. Of Rheum, Georgetown University Hos, Washington, DC 20007

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$421

12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Carol Deane Benedict of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $421 across 12 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 26th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $119 3
2024 General $51 2
2022 General $16 1
2021 General $59 3
2020 General $23 1
2019 General $153 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Carol Deane Benedict
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Carol Deane Benedict were reported at $119. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Carol Deane Benedict Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $153 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $23 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $59 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $16 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $0 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $51 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $119 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Integra LifeSciences Corporation $150 4 payments
  2. PolarityTE, Inc. $133 1 payment
  3. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $78 4 payments
  4. Checkpoint Surgical, Inc $20 1 payment
  5. MIMEDX Group, Inc. $20 1 payment
  6. PolyNovo North America LLC $20 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $421 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SkinTE $133 1 payment
  2. Integra Recon-Skin And Wound $131 3 payments
  3. Integra Recon-Skin And Wound $131 3 payments
  4. Integra Recon-Skin And Wound $131 3 payments
  5. INTEGRA DERMAL REGENERATION TEMPLATE $131 3 payments
  6. PRIMATRIX $131 3 payments
  7. GRAFIX PL $40 2 payments
  8. GRAFIX $23 1 payment
  9. STRAVIX $21 1 payment
  10. Checkpoint Stimulators $20 1 payment
  11. Other $54 3 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

464

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$600,134

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

36.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 35 $343,195
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 14 $103,767
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 22 $78,763
Kineret Anakinra Brand 11 $62,324
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 87 $3,158
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 15 $3,074
Colchicine Generic 15 $1,637
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 42 $1,614
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 32 $931
Prednisone Generic 66 $772

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$63,832

Of which drugs: $749

Medicare patients

160

Average age 71

Services billed

1,150

115 women, 45 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 65%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 29%
Osteoporosis 24%
Heart failure 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

12 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in District of Columbia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record