Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Carlos Ramirez

Rheumatology Pearland, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1982629309 CMS profile 270796

1920 Country Place Pkwy Ste 340, Pearland, TX 77584

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$33,002

1,065 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,294 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Carlos Ramirez of Pearland, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,002 across 1,065 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,294 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,814 147
2024 General $4,970 143
2023 General $5,827 175
2022 General $5,190 163
2021 General $3,797 135
2020 General $3,169 126
2019 General $5,235 176

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Carlos Ramirez
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Carlos Ramirez were reported at $4,814. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Carlos Ramirez Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $5,235 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,169 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,797 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $5,190 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $5,827 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $4,970 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $4,814 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $8,931 264 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $5,443 148 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,647 88 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,130 65 payments
  5. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,861 55 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,431 55 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,347 63 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,341 48 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $1,184 56 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,009 49 payments
  11. Other $5,677 174 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $32,650 1,057 payments
  2. Education $352 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $4,683 134 payments
  2. SAPHNELO $2,082 63 payments
  3. HUMIRA $1,943 62 payments
  4. ACTHAR $1,861 55 payments
  5. Cimzia $1,787 64 payments
  6. Otezla $1,588 43 payments
  7. SKYRIZI $1,459 49 payments
  8. TREMFYA $1,328 35 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $1,229 47 payments
  10. TALTZ $1,073 55 payments
  11. Other $16,578 621 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

1,571

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,294,695

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 59 $514,773
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 57 $432,754
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 39 $298,616
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 24 $153,965
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 17 $146,200
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 16 $138,736
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 22 $133,226
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 13 $104,447
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 13 $78,934
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 19 $78,408

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$542,855

Of which drugs: $489,491

Medicare patients

126

Average age 73

Services billed

34,301

107 women, 19 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 44%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Depression 26%
Heart failure 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,980 $40,848

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$892 — —
SAPHNELO
$430 — —
RINVOQ
$422 24 —
TREMFYA
$419 — —
Cimzia
$280 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,065 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record