Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Carlos Alvarez

Internal Medicine Bakersfield, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1891805610 CMS profile 176886

6001-B Truxtun Ave #220, Bakersfield, CA 93309

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$30,619

1,129 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Carlos Alvarez of Bakersfield, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $30,619 across 1,129 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,277 156
2024 General $3,987 169
2023 General $3,946 162
2022 General $3,690 198
2021 General $3,863 180
2020 General $2,270 128
2019 General $2,585 136

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Carlos Alvarez
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Carlos Alvarez were reported at $10,277. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Carlos Alvarez Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,585 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,270 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,863 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,690 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,946 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,987 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $10,277 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $6,688 26 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,682 123 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,366 83 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,170 136 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,748 92 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,393 59 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,249 64 payments
  8. Corcept Therapeutics $1,170 46 payments
  9. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $970 53 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $888 52 payments
  11. Other $9,295 395 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $24,202 1,122 payments
  2. Debt forgiveness $6,278 1 payment
  3. Education $80 5 payments
  4. Gift $59 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GRAFIX PL $6,278 1 payment
  2. FARXIGA $1,822 53 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,579 89 payments
  4. Kerendia $1,393 59 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $1,351 79 payments
  6. CREON $1,250 62 payments
  7. Korlym $1,170 46 payments
  8. LINZESS $991 54 payments
  9. VERQUVO $970 45 payments
  10. Repatha $890 49 payments
  11. Other $20,835 1,037 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 211 drugs

Part D claims

19,800

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,562,089

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 415 $290,665
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 297 $269,366
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 274 $231,441
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 302 $194,513
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 221 $140,682
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 205 $135,551
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 53 $120,210
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 150 $111,368
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 127 $104,300
Prolia Denosumab Brand 52 $82,997

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 211 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$424,525

Of which drugs: $3,364

Medicare patients

661

Average age 71

Services billed

16,252

344 women, 317 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 61%
Arthritis 43%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Heart failure 18%
COPD 18%
Depression 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, depo-estradiol cypionate, up to 5 mg J1000 Office 11 48 $1,122
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 226 1,190 $872
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 176 769 $401
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 158 400 $370
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 157 990 $343
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 89 758 $63
Injection, bupivicaine, not otherwise specified, 0.5 mg J0665 Office 14 18 $0

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
$275 127 —
Repatha
$252 — —
AREXVY
$206 15 —
Korlym
$206 — —
RYBELSUS
$171 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,129 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record