Who Paid My Doc
Camille Watson
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health Austin, TX Clinical Nurse Specialist
NPI 1811096324 CMS profile 10477058
4101 Parkstone Heights Dr Ste 360, Austin, TX 78746
General payments
$34,103
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Camille Watson of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $34,103 across 763 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $2,985 | 140 | |
| 2024 | General | $2,573 | 122 | |
| 2023 | General | $15,674 | 195 | |
| 2022 | General | $7,869 | 149 | |
| 2021 | General | $5,002 | 157 |
Beside peers
- Camille Watson
- Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health median
- Middle half of Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Camille Watson were reported at $2,985. Among 300 Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health profiles paid that year, the median was $245 and the middle half received between $78 and $929.
Show as a table
| Year | Camille Watson | Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | — | — | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | — | — | $114 |
| 2021 | $5,002 | $153 | $44–$540 | $132 |
| 2022 | $7,869 | $207 | $60–$748 | $149 |
| 2023 | $15,674 | $197 | $55–$898 | $160 |
| 2024 | $2,573 | $189 | $49–$804 | $164 |
| 2025 | $2,985 | $245 | $78–$929 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugsPart D claims
1,298
Drug cost
$337,852
Branded share of claims
27.4%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austedo Deutetrabenazine | Brand | 14 | $188,497 | |
| Abilify Asimtufii Aripiprazole | Brand | 11 | $48,705 | |
| Fanapt Iloperidone | Brand | 20 | $40,932 | |
| Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl | Brand | 23 | $31,293 | |
| Desvenlafaxine Succinate Er Desvenlafaxine Succinate | Brand | 165 | $6,765 | |
| Lamotrigine | Generic | 153 | $2,841 | |
| Asenapine Maleate | Generic | 12 | $2,760 | |
| Lurasidone Hcl | Generic | 15 | $2,661 | |
| Aripiprazole | Generic | 85 | $1,523 | |
| Sertraline Hcl | Generic | 91 | $1,169 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,644 Part D prescribers listed as Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Payments and prescribing
First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Product | Paid by | Related payments | Part D claims | Part B services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPLYTA |
|
$464 | — | — |
| ARISTADA |
|
$289 | — | — |
| REXULTI |
|
$264 | — | — |
| VRAYLAR |
|
$263 | 23 | — |
| Austedo XR |
|
$193 | 14 | — |
A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.
See all 18 in the dashboard with a free accountRecords
763 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health in Texas
Alfredo Arellano
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health · El Paso, TX
Nancy Daniels
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health · San Antonio, TX
Amy Wolford
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health · Houston, TX
Callie Land
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health · Amarillo, TX
Nita Patterson
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health · Vernon, TX
Stella Logan
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health · Austin, TX
Related records
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health in Texas
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Clinical Nurse Specialist, Psychiatric/Mental Health
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Texas
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.