Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Caitlin Williams

Nurse Practitioner, Family Thaxton, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1437622909 CMS profile 6635728

11145 Highway 6 W, Thaxton, MS 38871

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,192

485 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Caitlin Williams of Thaxton, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,192 across 485 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,081 107
2024 General $2,105 115
2023 General $1,597 86
2022 General $2,025 97
2021 General $1,385 80

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Caitlin Williams
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Caitlin Williams were reported at $2,081. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Caitlin Williams Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $1,385 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $2,025 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $1,597 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $2,105 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $2,081 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. ViiV Healthcare Company $2,608 142 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $2,016 111 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,084 52 payments
  4. Theratechnologies Inc. $805 38 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $685 43 payments
  6. Insmed, Inc. $645 29 payments
  7. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $503 27 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $332 23 payments
  9. La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company $187 10 payments
  10. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $178 4 payments
  11. Other $149 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,094 480 payments
  2. Education $98 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DOVATO $1,697 97 payments
  2. PIFELTRO $891 43 payments
  3. DELSTRIGO $709 35 payments
  4. EGRIFTA $705 33 payments
  5. CABENUVA $690 35 payments
  6. TROGARZO $677 31 payments
  7. Arikayce $509 25 payments
  8. NUZYRA $503 27 payments
  9. AVYCAZ $374 15 payments
  10. ISENTRESS $334 18 payments
  11. Other $2,847 157 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 76 drugs

Part D claims

4,291

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$5,007,068

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

47%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 706 $2,841,872
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 259 $924,443
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 102 $415,677
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 74 $218,675
Cabenuva Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 21 $142,379
Pifeltro Doravirine Brand 71 $125,899
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 37 $106,026
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 46 $101,655
Daptomycin Generic 53 $33,313
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 24 $14,428

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 76 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$28,636

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

226

Average age 70

Services billed

472

99 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 61%
Diabetes 47%
Ischemic heart disease 46%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Depression 35%
COPD 34%
Atrial fibrillation 33%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $304
$304 74 —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $241
$241 21 —
NUZYRA
  • Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $164
$164 — —
PIFELTRO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $104
$105 71 —
DELSTRIGO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $104
$105 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

485 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record