Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brynn Cinnamon

Nurse Practitioner Peoria, IL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1154555852 CMS profile 10677737

1001 Main St, Suite 500A, Peoria, IL 61606

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,009

538 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Brynn Cinnamon of Peoria, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,009 across 538 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $16 1
2024 General $8,958 193
2023 General $1,635 112
2022 General $4,946 132
2021 General $1,453 100

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brynn Cinnamon
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brynn Cinnamon were reported at $16. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Brynn Cinnamon Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,453 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $4,946 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,635 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $8,958 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $16 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $9,827 43 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,674 171 payments
  3. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,080 83 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $759 53 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $492 30 payments
  6. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $456 49 payments
  7. Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. $449 37 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $314 20 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $219 12 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $139 7 payments
  11. Other $600 33 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,889 521 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,590 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,417 9 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,040 1 payment
  5. Education $74 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Epclusa $5,686 12 payments
  2. XIFAXAN $1,051 81 payments
  3. RINVOQ $851 48 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $780 43 payments
  5. HUMIRA $672 32 payments
  6. ZENPEP $663 68 payments
  7. CREON $632 55 payments
  8. LINZESS $531 42 payments
  9. ENTYVIO $475 33 payments
  10. STELARA $393 23 payments
  11. Other $2,585 168 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,336

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$279,763

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

19.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 12 $58,753
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 15 $57,141
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 28 $56,861
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 43 $48,031
Dexlansoprazole Dr Dexlansoprazole Brand 30 $10,966
Nexium Esomeprazole Magnesium Brand 13 $7,931
Ursodiol Generic 57 $7,274
Omeprazole Generic 415 $5,252
Colestipol Hcl Generic 43 $3,222
Pantoprazole Sodium Generic 234 $3,097

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 6 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$31,079

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

480

Average age 74

Services billed

524

308 women, 172 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 46%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
COPD 23%
Depression 23%
Heart failure 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Epclusa
$2,391 — —
XIFAXAN
$343 12 —
RINVOQ
$278 — —
ZENPEP
$223 15 —
SKYRIZI
$222 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

538 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record