Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bryan Gray

Dermatology Lima, OH Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1831514025 CMS profile 2782817

525 N Eastown Rd Ste A, Lima, OH 45807

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$55,486

904 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Bryan Gray of Lima, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $55,486 across 904 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $38,692 202
2024 General $3,700 196
2023 General $7,740 193
2022 General $2,199 157
2021 General $1,630 103
2020 General $759 36
2019 General $766 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bryan Gray
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bryan Gray were reported at $38,692. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Bryan Gray Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $766 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $759 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,630 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,199 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $7,740 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,700 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $38,692 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $32,914 52 payments
  2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $6,127 78 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,979 213 payments
  4. Incyte Corporation $2,908 16 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,208 116 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $882 51 payments
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $808 37 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $711 40 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $566 32 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $540 46 payments
  11. Other $4,842 223 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $31,613 16 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $15,535 867 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $5,200 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,294 7 payments
  5. Education $844 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EBGLYSS $32,509 29 payments
  2. ILUMYA $5,775 67 payments
  3. TREMFYA $2,155 106 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,223 69 payments
  5. RINVOQ $1,210 81 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $1,208 96 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $625 26 payments
  8. SOTYKTU $542 30 payments
  9. SPEVIGO $507 22 payments
  10. ADBRY $469 30 payments
  11. Other $8,058 472 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

2,777

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,595,149

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

9.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 39 $516,736
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 98 $422,745
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 13 $255,135
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 28 $233,837
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 18 $115,774
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 169 $8,495
Fluorouracil Generic 78 $6,666
Acitretin Generic 23 $6,346
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 320 $3,250
Ketoconazole Generic 226 $3,040

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 130 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,739,473

Of which drugs: $1,905,192

Medicare patients

1,632

Average age 74

Services billed

36,373

886 women, 746 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 26%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 16%
Heart failure 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tildrakizumab, 1 mg J3245 Office 38 10,503 $1,129,271
Amniowrap2, per square centimeter Q4221 Office 16 410 $576,825
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 21 4,400 $5,841
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 61 274 $200
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 43 229 $20

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$605 — —
ILUMYA
$408 — 10,503
DUPIXENT
$354 98 —
RINVOQ
$322 28 —
SKYRIZI
$249 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

904 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record