Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bruce MacKey

Pain Medicine Edmond, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1891799821 CMS profile 177000

3957 E Covell Rd, Edmond, OK 73034

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,692

421 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Bruce MacKey of Edmond, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,692 across 421 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,224 56
2024 General $786 35
2023 General $1,028 56
2022 General $2,202 65
2021 General $1,612 77
2020 General $1,027 42
2019 General $5,814 90

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bruce MacKey
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bruce MacKey were reported at $1,224. Among 757 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $470 and the middle half received between $146 and $1,462.

Show as a table
Year Bruce MacKey Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,814 $506 $144–$1,566 $163
2020 $1,027 $315 $96–$934 $114
2021 $1,612 $452 $134–$1,237 $132
2022 $2,202 $475 $124–$1,407 $149
2023 $1,028 $480 $136–$1,384 $160
2024 $786 $521 $164–$1,511 $164
2025 $1,224 $470 $146–$1,462 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Flowonix Medical Incorporated $4,170 1 payment
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $1,799 33 payments
  3. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $1,014 88 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $796 18 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $556 22 payments
  6. Nevro Corp. $551 12 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $513 8 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $444 32 payments
  9. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. $368 24 payments
  10. TerSera Therapeutics LLC $351 19 payments
  11. Other $3,131 164 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,692 415 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,170 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $440 3 payments
  4. Education $282 1 payment
  5. Debt forgiveness $108 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Prometra II $4,170 1 payment
  2. SYNCHROMEDII $924 11 payments
  3. BELBUCA $757 70 payments
  4. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $513 12 payments
  5. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $438 6 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $428 26 payments
  7. Superion $414 6 payments
  8. PRIALT $329 18 payments
  9. INSPIRE $299 4 payments
  10. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $293 2 payments
  11. Other $6,902 398 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

9,223

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$871,082

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

50.8%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 275 $252,070
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 900 $148,832
Buprenorphine Generic 290 $78,903
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,915 $77,546
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 110 $66,573
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 109 $62,517
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 1,737 $40,119
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 1,045 $34,403
Fentanyl Generic 175 $16,744
Oxymorphone Hcl Er Oxymorphone Hcl Brand 38 $11,851

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$363,900

Of which drugs: $35

Medicare patients

401

Average age 70

Services billed

5,163

255 women, 146 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 44%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
COPD 25%
Heart failure 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 18 220 $18
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 16 42 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $144
$144 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $117
$117 275 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $115
$115 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $38
$38 109 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $31
$31 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

421 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record