Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bruce Cleeremans

Neurology Irvine, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1205042249 CMS profile 99186

16405 Sand Canyon Ave Ste 220, Irvine, CA 92618

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,781

1,157 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$576

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$398,226 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Bruce Cleeremans of Irvine, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,781 across 1,157 general payments and $576 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $398,226 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,396 143
2024 General $5,361 224
2023 General $3,984 176
2022 General $3,743 187
2021 General $3,571 179
2020 General $2,564 130
2019 General $2,161 118
2019 Research $576 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bruce Cleeremans
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bruce Cleeremans were reported at $3,396. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Bruce Cleeremans Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,161 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $2,564 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $3,571 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $3,743 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $3,984 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $5,361 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $3,396 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $3,676 174 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,020 122 payments
  3. Biogen, Inc. $1,714 84 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,377 61 payments
  5. Eisai Inc. $1,228 57 payments
  6. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $996 49 payments
  7. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $958 51 payments
  8. EMD Serono, Inc. $869 45 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $713 39 payments
  10. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $707 43 payments
  11. Other $10,523 432 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $24,642 1,151 payments
  2. Education $119 5 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Briviact $1,517 80 payments
  2. Rystiggo $1,309 58 payments
  3. TYSABRI $972 55 payments
  4. UBRELVY $889 37 payments
  5. VUMERITY $856 39 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $833 44 payments
  7. APTIOM $810 42 payments
  8. KESIMPTA Neuroscience $783 48 payments
  9. KESIMPTA Neurology $743 38 payments
  10. QULIPTA $730 35 payments
  11. Other $17,081 795 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $576 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,731

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$642,608

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

17.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 17 $186,577
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 12 $163,010
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 13 $120,815
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 13 $74,599
Belsomra Suvorexant Brand 49 $21,977
Memantine Hcl Generic 290 $19,275
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 18 $15,121
Donepezil Hcl Generic 413 $5,914
Memantine Hcl Er Memantine Hcl Brand 40 $5,679
Lacosamide Generic 14 $5,634

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$74,088

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

316

Average age 76

Services billed

693

179 women, 137 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 58%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Cancer 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Rystiggo
$898 — —
KESIMPTA
$297 17 —
Gocovri
$291 — —
Briviact
$258 — —
NOURIANZ
$249 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,158 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record