Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brock Cookman

Interventional Cardiology Lincoln, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1427286681 CMS profile 291453

1600 S 48Th St, Ste 600, Lincoln, NE 68506

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$782,443

863 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$221,189 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Brock Cookman of Lincoln, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $782,443 across 863 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $221,189 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Interventional Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $95,472 86
2024 General $155,822 153
2023 General $334,087 267
2022 General $155,837 161
2021 General $31,854 84
2020 General $2,214 26
2019 General $7,157 86

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brock Cookman
  • Interventional Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Interventional Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brock Cookman were reported at $95,472. Among 6,173 Interventional Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,092 and the middle half received between $366 and $3,019.

Show as a table
Year Brock Cookman Interventional Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,157 $1,097 $329–$3,048 $163
2020 $2,214 $473 $161–$1,480 $114
2021 $31,854 $677 $233–$1,827 $132
2022 $155,837 $978 $333–$2,724 $149
2023 $334,087 $1,136 $382–$2,986 $160
2024 $155,822 $1,181 $395–$3,326 $164
2025 $95,472 $1,092 $366–$3,019 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $742,306 601 payments
  2. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $30,248 29 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,800 28 payments
  4. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $1,507 26 payments
  5. Abiomed $1,451 19 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $1,374 60 payments
  7. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $912 28 payments
  8. Cardiovascular Systems Inc. $495 10 payments
  9. Inari Medical, Inc. $284 4 payments
  10. CathWorks, Inc. $181 2 payments
  11. Other $886 56 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $580,893 126 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $139,600 287 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $27,521 11 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $22,257 431 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $11,150 6 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $1,000 1 payment
  7. Education $22 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AMPLATZER AMULET $619,690 427 payments
  2. DRAGONFLY OPSTAR $37,153 30 payments
  3. Dragonfly OCT $28,386 22 payments
  4. ACUSON Origin Diagnostic Ultrasound System $20,326 15 payments
  5. AMPLATZER $18,542 19 payments
  6. OPTIS $17,714 25 payments
  7. ACUSON SC2000 Diagnostic Ultrasound System $8,634 7 payments
  8. AMPLATZER PICCOLO $6,500 3 payments
  9. Xience V coronary stent system $2,764 10 payments
  10. AMPLATZER TALISMAN $2,678 6 payments
  11. Other $19,146 307 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

3,827

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$408,486

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

18.6%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 214 $186,154
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 115 $74,153
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 48 $44,423
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 34 $39,855
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 20 $16,206
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 12 $8,969
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 13 $7,066
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 319 $3,817
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 462 $3,630
Carvedilol Generic 552 $3,079

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$240,383

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,753

Average age 77

Services billed

3,326

880 women, 873 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 56%
Arthritis 52%
Heart failure 46%
Atrial fibrillation 46%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Diabetes 34%
COPD 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

863 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Cardiology in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record