Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Briccio Cadiz

Internal Medicine Festus, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1932182722 CMS profile 41680

1447 US Highway 61 Ste B, Festus, MO 63028

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,507

1,186 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Briccio Cadiz of Festus, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,507 across 1,186 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,287 152
2024 General $3,083 146
2023 General $4,281 227
2022 General $2,839 161
2021 General $2,389 143
2020 General $1,671 120
2019 General $2,958 237

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Briccio Cadiz
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Briccio Cadiz were reported at $3,287. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Briccio Cadiz Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,958 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,671 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,389 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,839 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $4,281 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,083 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,287 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $5,587 271 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,687 132 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,305 63 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,128 64 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,062 76 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $963 90 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $703 52 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $673 58 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $563 30 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $502 27 payments
  11. Other $6,333 323 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,295 1,175 payments
  2. Education $212 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $3,080 147 payments
  2. QULIPTA $1,335 60 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,155 93 payments
  4. Repatha $893 66 payments
  5. FARXIGA $892 38 payments
  6. Otezla $721 51 payments
  7. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $703 41 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $693 53 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $659 31 payments
  10. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $555 53 payments
  11. Other $15,143 914 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 229 drugs

Part D claims

19,840

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,535,322

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 159 $227,292
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 227 $170,064
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 103 $154,575
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 84 $97,530
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 75 $64,309
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 42 $52,176
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 52 $42,597
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 17 $42,488
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 45 $38,548
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 35 $34,693

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 229 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$159,408

Of which drugs: $32,791

Medicare patients

519

Average age 75

Services billed

2,628

293 women, 226 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 36%
Depression 34%
Heart failure 30%
Atrial fibrillation 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 96 96 $27,883
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 58 58 $4,696

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 44 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$290 — —
UBRELVY
$178 13 —
MOUNJARO
$150 103 —
Wegovy
$118 14 —
REXULTI
$116 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 44 with Patron

Records

1,186 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record