Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brianna Bingham

Internal Medicine Overland Park, KS Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1396305389 CMS profile 7130864

12140 Nall Ave Ste 100, Overland Park, KS 66209

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,151

251 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Brianna Bingham of Overland Park, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,151 across 251 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $836 40
2024 General $1,371 76
2023 General $2,455 104
2022 General $476 30
2021 General $13 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brianna Bingham
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brianna Bingham were reported at $836. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Brianna Bingham Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $13 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $476 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,455 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,371 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $836 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $806 45 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $605 26 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $481 20 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $400 17 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $367 24 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $348 24 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $233 6 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $231 7 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $162 5 payments
  10. Radius Health, Inc. $125 4 payments
  11. Other $1,394 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,151 251 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. BREZTRI $348 11 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT $335 22 payments
  3. MOUNJARO $317 12 payments
  4. Ozempic $288 18 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $288 18 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $284 16 payments
  7. Wegovy $245 4 payments
  8. Veozah $233 6 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $215 5 payments
  10. UBRELVY $209 12 payments
  11. Other $3,897 213 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 108 drugs

Part D claims

6,086

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$386,482

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 75 $89,460
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 65 $81,216
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 37 $47,703
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 29 $38,140
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 36 $33,365
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 11 $14,828
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 11 $7,116
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 431 $4,293
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 50 $4,225
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 474 $3,893

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 108 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$109,419

Of which drugs: $55,562

Medicare patients

362

Average age 74

Services billed

5,108

316 women, 46 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 25%
Osteoporosis 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Depression 19%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,680 $34,221
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 17 17 $1,391

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $122
$122 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $118
$118 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $85
$85 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $71
$71 — —
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $67
$67 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

251 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Kansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record