Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brett Rawlins

Nurse Practitioner, Family Kaysville, UT Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1295983831 CMS profile 7216778

1351 W 200 N, Kaysville, UT 84037

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$149,184

972 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Brett Rawlins of Kaysville, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $149,184 across 972 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $47,357 259
2024 General $12,821 175
2023 General $24,698 184
2022 General $33,058 206
2021 General $31,251 148

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brett Rawlins
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brett Rawlins were reported at $47,357. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Brett Rawlins Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $31,251 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $33,058 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $24,698 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $12,821 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $47,357 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $83,479 223 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $33,758 276 payments
  3. Corcept Therapeutics $17,323 53 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $4,766 77 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $2,187 29 payments
  6. Insulet Corporation $2,170 14 payments
  7. Dexcom, Inc. $1,021 68 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $736 30 payments
  9. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $493 24 payments
  10. Beta Bionics, Inc. $427 23 payments
  11. Other $2,824 155 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $94,200 85 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $23,024 103 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $16,836 763 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $5,525 9 payments
  5. Honoraria $5,113 2 payments
  6. Consulting Fee $4,403 5 payments
  7. Education $84 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $46,290 149 payments
  2. Ozempic $31,703 134 payments
  3. FreeStyle Libre 3 $25,144 185 payments
  4. Korlym $17,323 53 payments
  5. FREESTYLE LIBRE $7,207 45 payments
  6. LYUMJEV $3,965 13 payments
  7. Omnipod $2,170 14 payments
  8. MINIMED 780G $2,143 26 payments
  9. FreeStyle Libre 2 $1,092 40 payments
  10. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $864 55 payments
  11. Other $8,216 458 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 61 drugs

Part D claims

2,809

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,377,647

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

51.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 204 $286,084
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 172 $219,790
Humalog Kwikpen U-200 Insulin Lispro Brand 54 $169,103
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 88 $99,175
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 77 $98,535
Humulin R U-500 Insulin Regular, Human Brand 48 $83,497
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 44 $70,060
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 63 $58,110
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 26 $52,011
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 44 $44,767

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 61 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$41,868

Of which drugs: $1,028

Medicare patients

138

Average age 71

Services billed

4,686

72 women, 66 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Depression 33%
Heart failure 19%
Atrial fibrillation 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 12 12 $982

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Ozempic
$2,649 204 —
RYBELSUS
$2,252 44 —
TZIELD
$304 — —
Korlym
$169 — —
XYOSTED
$135 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

972 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record