Medical Doctor Program year 2021 Reported 2019–2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brett Coons

Allergy Jb Andrews, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1780670281 CMS profile 171889

1050 W Perimeter Rd, Jb Andrews, MD 20762

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,274

36 records reported · program years 2019–2021

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2021, Brett Coons of Jb Andrews, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $49,274 across 36 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Allergy profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 General $5,000 4
2020 General $10,901 6
2019 General $33,374 26

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brett Coons
  • Allergy median
  • Middle half of Allergy
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brett Coons were reported at $0. Among 526 Allergy profiles paid that year, the median was $1,143 and the middle half received between $226 and $2,504.

Show as a table
Year Brett Coons Allergy median Middle half National median
2019 $33,374 $506 $151–$1,337 $163
2020 $10,901 $409 $108–$1,162 $114
2021 $5,000 $549 $125–$1,485 $132
2022 $0 $666 $161–$1,594 $149
2023 $0 $780 $186–$1,916 $160
2024 $0 $1,031 $271–$2,196 $164
2025 $0 $1,143 $226–$2,504 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Phadia US Inc. $49,274 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Honoraria $39,398 22 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $9,366 8 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $511 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. ImmunoCAP $49,274 36 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

547

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$470,547

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

28.9%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 13 $129,661
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 31 $125,283
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 24 $88,061
Nucala Mepolizumab Brand 15 $78,932
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 18 $24,528
Cromolyn Sodium Generic 13 $5,527
Azelastine-Fluticasone Azelastine/Fluticasone Brand 19 $4,521
Epinephrine Generic 18 $3,821
Azelastine Hcl Generic 64 $2,292
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 27 $1,287

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$117,238

Of which drugs: $6,706

Medicare patients

276

Average age 72

Services billed

5,087

186 women, 90 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 11 12 $1,886
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 15 15 $1,227

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

36 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record