Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brent Boyce

Dermatology Sebewaing, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1417944786 CMS profile 199891

106 E Main St, Sebewaing, MI 48759

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$171,061

1,484 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$23,442

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,072,152 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Brent Boyce of Sebewaing, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $171,061 across 1,484 general payments and $23,442 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,072,152 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,853 240
2024 General $32,038 254
2024 Research $114 1
2023 General $39,272 250
2022 General $29,534 256
2021 General $9,162 192
2020 General $12,591 109
2020 Research $884 2
2019 General $37,612 183
2019 Research $22,443 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brent Boyce
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brent Boyce were reported at $10,853. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Brent Boyce Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $37,612 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $12,591 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $9,162 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $29,534 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $39,272 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $32,038 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $10,853 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $78,144 287 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $64,890 329 payments
  3. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $11,902 15 payments
  4. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $2,635 47 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $2,204 127 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,940 143 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $1,302 62 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $1,212 66 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $903 54 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $894 39 payments
  11. Other $5,036 315 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $138,105 63 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $24,559 1,382 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,215 19 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $1,800 1 payment
  5. Education $1,382 19 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $75,852 259 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $44,023 141 payments
  3. HUMIRA $12,383 57 payments
  4. RINVOQ $6,091 82 payments
  5. SILIQ $2,277 25 payments
  6. ILUMYA $1,507 91 payments
  7. DUPIXENT $1,466 76 payments
  8. STELARA $1,166 116 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $931 82 payments
  10. REMICADE $931 82 payments
  11. Other $12,980 867 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $23,442 5 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

3,408

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$7,849,961

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

26.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 140 $2,922,624
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 113 $1,098,057
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 64 $860,072
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 156 $626,470
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 16 $422,867
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 64 $401,235
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 40 $363,101
Otezla Apremilast Brand 54 $258,328
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 22 $235,581
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 21 $198,627

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 75 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$311,713

Of which drugs: $89,298

Medicare patients

1,531

Average age 76

Services billed

7,955

778 women, 753 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Depression 17%
Cancer 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$27,868 64 —
SKYRIZI
$950 140 —
DUPIXENT
$436 200 —
SOTYKTU
$283 — —
Bimzelx
$220 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

1,489 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record