Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brandon Coakley

MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Myrtle Beach, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1992065858 CMS profile 647809

917 Medical Cir, Myrtle Beach, SC 29572

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23,842

204 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$163,282 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Brandon Coakley of Myrtle Beach, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23,842 across 204 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $163,282 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,123 31
2024 General $859 31
2023 General $2,563 41
2022 General $684 29
2021 General $825 27
2020 General $79 5
2019 General $17,708 40

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brandon Coakley
  • MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median
  • Middle half of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brandon Coakley were reported at $1,123. Among 1,077 MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $465 and the middle half received between $145 and $1,066.

Show as a table
Year Brandon Coakley MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $17,708 $316 $106–$785 $163
2020 $79 $162 $68–$412 $114
2021 $825 $243 $87–$654 $132
2022 $684 $300 $102–$887 $149
2023 $2,563 $364 $125–$1,010 $160
2024 $859 $445 $142–$1,108 $164
2025 $1,123 $465 $145–$1,066 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $18,429 75 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $2,249 19 payments
  3. Organogenesis Inc. $625 18 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $548 14 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $286 6 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $261 8 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $241 9 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $219 8 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $162 8 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $128 4 payments
  11. Other $694 35 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $14,875 5 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $5,487 186 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,681 7 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $1,419 1 payment
  5. Education $380 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HUMIRA $3,588 18 payments
  2. LIBTAYO $2,423 20 payments
  3. SKYRIZI Immunology $548 32 payments
  4. Puraply $444 12 payments
  5. Erivedge $261 8 payments
  6. SKYRIZI Immunology $210 9 payments
  7. TREMFYA $183 6 payments
  8. Cimzia $144 5 payments
  9. BOTOX $133 3 payments
  10. ILUMYA $129 10 payments
  11. Other $1,915 95 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

294

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$2,540

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Fluorouracil Generic 33 $1,896
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 11 $311
Amoxicillin Generic 125 $142
Tramadol Hcl Generic 76 $141
Clindamycin Hcl Generic 19 $25
Lorazepam Generic 30 $25

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 89 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,259,617

Of which drugs: $13,362

Medicare patients

1,223

Average age 77

Services billed

15,060

419 women, 804 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 18%
Heart failure 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $177
$177 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $151
$151 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $98
$98 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $32
$32 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

204 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other MOHS-Micrographic Surgery in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record