Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2023–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bradley Collins

Rheumatology Summerville, SC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1326533308 CMS profile 5354130

2001 2Nd Ave Ste 201, Summerville, SC 29486

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,027

298 records reported · program years 2023–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2023–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Bradley Collins of Summerville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,027 across 298 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 63rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,486 121
2024 General $2,553 129
2023 General $989 48

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bradley Collins
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bradley Collins were reported at $2,486. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Bradley Collins Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $0 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $989 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,553 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,486 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,259 60 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,045 53 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,024 52 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $491 25 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $434 21 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $412 19 payments
  7. Sandoz Inc. $315 20 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $206 10 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $191 9 payments
  10. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $143 6 payments
  11. Other $506 23 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,027 298 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. TREMFYA $962 49 payments
  2. RINVOQ $737 40 payments
  3. COSENTYX $434 21 payments
  4. TALTZ $412 19 payments
  5. Bimzelx $398 20 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $357 16 payments
  7. Otezla $333 18 payments
  8. Enbrel $332 17 payments
  9. HYRIMOZ $264 18 payments
  10. SKYRIZI $217 9 payments
  11. Other $1,781 90 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

604

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$430,540

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 23 $211,368
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 11 $123,603
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 12 $81,224
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 110 $4,502
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 93 $2,766
Leflunomide Generic 27 $2,027
Celecoxib Generic 23 $1,245
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 13 $1,107
Methylprednisolone Generic 59 $1,071
Prednisone Generic 131 $750

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,569,440

Of which drugs: $2,399,518

Medicare patients

633

Average age 73

Services billed

150,534

480 women, 153 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 40%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 72 16,525 $559,313
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 107 39,274 $353,329
Injection, belimumab, 10 mg J0490 Office 15 4,073 $166,154
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 24 31,040 $144,435
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 19 10,710 $92,390
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 19 24,400 $87,496
Injection, infliximab-abda, biosimilar, (renflexis), 10 mg Q5104 Office 30 3,230 $74,148
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 11 1,200 $73,487
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 54 3,540 $73,177
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 24 2,610 $64,399

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $432
$432 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $285
$285 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $212
$212 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $198
$198 11 —
HYRIMOZ
  • Sandoz Inc. $145
$145 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

298 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record