Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Booth Durham

Dermatology Sewell, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1740392075 CMS profile 1011094

570 Egg Harbor Rd, Ste C1, Sewell, NJ 08080

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$33,707

1,311 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Booth Durham of Sewell, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,707 across 1,311 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,253 187
2024 General $4,620 234
2023 General $7,148 214
2022 General $4,432 227
2021 General $2,440 149
2020 General $1,569 98
2019 General $9,246 202

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Booth Durham
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Booth Durham were reported at $4,253. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Booth Durham Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $9,246 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,569 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,440 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $4,432 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $7,148 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $4,620 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $4,253 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $4,867 80 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,209 94 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $3,288 34 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,736 157 payments
  5. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,828 117 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,780 79 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,716 38 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $1,535 82 payments
  9. LEO Pharma Inc. $1,455 110 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,392 50 payments
  11. Other $8,904 470 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $24,545 1,292 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,782 5 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $2,800 1 payment
  4. Education $580 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ILUMYA $4,171 58 payments
  2. COSENTYX $3,403 20 payments
  3. EUCRISA $3,129 29 payments
  4. TREMFYA $1,658 31 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $1,451 81 payments
  6. OPZELURA $1,146 42 payments
  7. TALTZ $1,076 66 payments
  8. Bimzelx $1,064 43 payments
  9. ADBRY $1,059 86 payments
  10. DUPIXENT $747 32 payments
  11. Other $17,652 999 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

1,249

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$512,050

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

14.7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 21 $152,994
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 14 $95,361
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 22 $80,570
Siliq Brodalumab Brand 14 $70,420
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $47,587
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 20 $37,318
Ketoconazole Generic 109 $3,172
Metronidazole Generic 33 $3,086
Fluorouracil Generic 42 $2,764
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 43 $2,564

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,035,901

Of which drugs: $822,590

Medicare patients

747

Average age 76

Services billed

11,015

329 women, 418 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Cancer 19%
COPD 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tildrakizumab, 1 mg J3245 Office 17 7,200 $774,740
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 22 25 $7,723
Methotrexate sodium, 50 mg J9260 Office 13 21 $46
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 25 52 $39

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$593 — —
Zoryve
$539 — —
Bimzelx
$389 — —
TREMFYA
$370 — —
OPZELURA
$303 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,311 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record