Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Blakely Richardson

Dermatology Austin, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1659697431 CMS profile 29999

2559 Western Trails Blvd, Suite 301, Austin, TX 78745

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$31,444

247 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$247,379 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Blakely Richardson of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $31,444 across 247 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $247,379 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $789 42
2024 General $3,245 27
2023 General $4,066 27
2022 General $502 18
2021 General $14,421 22
2020 General $456 27
2019 General $7,965 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Blakely Richardson
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Blakely Richardson were reported at $789. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Blakely Richardson Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,965 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $456 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $14,421 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $502 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $4,066 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,245 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $789 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $14,170 8 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $13,869 73 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $492 17 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $457 31 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $386 19 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $324 13 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $292 10 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $251 11 payments
  9. LEO Pharma Inc. $231 13 payments
  10. STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. $134 15 payments
  11. Other $839 37 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $25,477 18 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $4,784 222 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,076 5 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $100 1 payment
  5. Education $7 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $7,163 41 payments
  2. ILUMYA $492 17 payments
  3. SOTYKTU $292 10 payments
  4. DUPIXENT $274 11 payments
  5. CIBINQO $245 7 payments
  6. TALTZ $226 10 payments
  7. HUMIRA $220 12 payments
  8. EUCRISA $211 16 payments
  9. ORACEA $186 4 payments
  10. BOTOX $184 3 payments
  11. Other $2,354 124 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

739

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$14,805

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

5.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ketoconazole Generic 175 $2,300
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 37 $2,061
Ciclopirox Generic 44 $1,732
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 152 $1,700
Metronidazole Generic 27 $1,322
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 57 $1,043
Fluocinonide Generic 33 $977
Tacrolimus Generic 12 $953
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 32 $829
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 26 $473

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,035,624

Of which drugs: $832,868

Medicare patients

554

Average age 74

Services billed

9,242

309 women, 245 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 40%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Diabetes 16%
Depression 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tildrakizumab, 1 mg J3245 Office 17 5,500 $591,991
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 28 92 $68

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $167
$167 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $127
$127 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $83
$83 — —
ILUMYA
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $80
$80 — 5,500
ADBRY
  • LEO Pharma Inc. $72
$72 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

247 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record