Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Billy Hour

Hospitalist Mission Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1790097004 CMS profile 556365

11550 Indian Hills Rd, Suite 371, Mission Hills, CA 91345

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,321

130 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,922,941 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Billy Hour of Mission Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,321 across 130 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,922,941 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Hospitalist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $644 26
2024 General $525 23
2023 General $531 24
2022 General $204 6
2021 General $447 16
2020 General $278 13
2019 General $692 22

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Billy Hour
  • Hospitalist median
  • Middle half of Hospitalist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Billy Hour were reported at $644. Among 6,882 Hospitalist profiles paid that year, the median was $86 and the middle half received between $30 and $191.

Show as a table
Year Billy Hour Hospitalist median Middle half National median
2019 $692 $96 $28–$201 $163
2020 $278 $48 $19–$125 $114
2021 $447 $70 $23–$167 $132
2022 $204 $85 $27–$174 $149
2023 $531 $89 $30–$191 $160
2024 $525 $95 $29–$204 $164
2025 $644 $86 $30–$191 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $567 20 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $549 24 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $410 22 payments
  4. Relypsa, Inc. $370 12 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $188 9 payments
  6. Cardiovascular Systems Inc. $160 1 payment
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $153 3 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $143 3 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $142 6 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $113 5 payments
  11. Other $527 25 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,924 125 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $200 1 payment
  3. Education $197 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $378 14 payments
  2. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $345 19 payments
  3. Veltassa $281 7 payments
  4. LOKELMA $233 12 payments
  5. JESDUVROQ $189 6 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $188 9 payments
  7. TAVNEOS $166 3 payments
  8. Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System $160 1 payment
  9. ACTHAR $153 3 payments
  10. FARXIGA $152 9 payments
  11. Other $986 43 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

708

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$99,241

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

21.3%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Epogen Epoetin Alfa Brand 19 $17,596
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 33 $16,577
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 22 $15,647
Retacrit Epoetin Alfa-Epbx Brand 23 $14,958
Veltassa Patiromer Calcium Sorbitex Brand 12 $14,229
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 16 $11,812
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 15 $1,894
Calcitriol Generic 72 $1,192
Bumetanide Generic 28 $966
Calcium Acetate Generic 13 $717

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$577,418

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

755

Average age 75

Services billed

4,559

363 women, 392 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 58%
Heart failure 56%
Ischemic heart disease 55%
Arthritis 54%
Depression 37%
Atrial fibrillation 34%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $270
$270 — —
JESDUVROQ
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $101
$101 — —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $36
$36 33 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $30
$30 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $20
$20 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

130 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hospitalist in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record