Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Biljinder Chima

Sports Medicine Rocklin, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1205084910 CMS profile 8612

3104 Sunset Blvd Ste 2B, Rocklin, CA 95677

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,661

879 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Biljinder Chima of Rocklin, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,661 across 879 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,078 97
2024 General $2,290 125
2023 General $2,500 126
2022 General $2,616 146
2021 General $2,481 155
2020 General $2,220 135
2019 General $1,475 95

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Biljinder Chima
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Biljinder Chima were reported at $2,078. Among 1,257 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $114 and the middle half received between $39 and $293.

Show as a table
Year Biljinder Chima Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,475 $119 $35–$362 $163
2020 $2,220 $77 $24–$275 $114
2021 $2,481 $104 $28–$340 $132
2022 $2,616 $94 $31–$272 $149
2023 $2,500 $91 $34–$271 $160
2024 $2,290 $126 $38–$294 $164
2025 $2,078 $114 $39–$293 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,408 122 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,760 99 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,690 82 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,041 69 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,017 49 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $903 60 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $886 56 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $811 42 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $363 18 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $348 28 payments
  11. Other $4,435 254 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,602 873 payments
  2. Education $59 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $992 49 payments
  2. Ozempic $902 63 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $830 60 payments
  4. SHINGRIX $779 36 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $704 51 payments
  6. FARXIGA $700 37 payments
  7. QULIPTA $625 41 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $595 25 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $577 35 payments
  10. BREZTRI $468 18 payments
  11. Other $14,346 783 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 191 drugs

Part D claims

12,821

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,208,453

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

23%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 251 $247,737
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 179 $149,309
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 110 $131,236
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 61 $65,765
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 44 $53,394
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 56 $40,788
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 22 $34,716
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 44 $29,865
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 19 $28,875
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 33 $27,621

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 191 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$233,309

Of which drugs: $43,606

Medicare patients

536

Average age 75

Services billed

5,491

293 women, 243 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Cancer 18%
Depression 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,620 $33,435
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 62 63 $4,627
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 31 155 $144
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 78 $59
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 22 136 $12

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$311 110 —
NURTEC ODT
$140 — —
SHINGRIX
$122 — —
AREXVY
$122 — —
Veozah
$110 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

879 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Sports Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record