Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bilal Kaaki

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery Riverside, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1063464089 CMS profile 230092

4646 Brockton Ave Ste 302-5, Riverside, CA 92506

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$301,309

148 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$518,900

4 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Bilal Kaaki of Riverside, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $301,309 across 148 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $518,900 across 4 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $50,746 41
2024 General $9,458 19
2023 General $176,497 33
2022 General $62,715 39
2021 General $473 8
2019 General $1,420 8
2025 Ownership $129,725 1
2024 Ownership $129,725 1
2023 Ownership $129,725 1
2022 Ownership $129,725 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bilal Kaaki
  • Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery median
  • Middle half of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bilal Kaaki were reported at $50,746. Among 802 Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $412 and the middle half received between $133 and $1,300.

Show as a table
Year Bilal Kaaki Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $1,420 $358 $132–$1,270 $163
2020 $0 $198 $86–$642 $114
2021 $473 $361 $118–$1,182 $132
2022 $62,715 $410 $128–$1,175 $149
2023 $176,497 $434 $152–$1,344 $160
2024 $9,458 $494 $193–$1,331 $164
2025 $50,746 $412 $133–$1,300 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Valencia Technologies Corporation $276,474 64 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $16,804 24 payments
  3. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $4,000 1 payment
  4. Coloplast Corp $1,443 8 payments
  5. C. R. Bard, Inc. & Subsidiaries $597 2 payments
  6. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $397 16 payments
  7. Becton, Dickinson and Company $265 1 payment
  8. Caldera Medical, Inc $257 4 payments
  9. Caris MPI, Inc. $238 2 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $169 6 payments
  11. Other $666 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $261,326 28 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $17,546 26 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $14,112 8 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $4,325 85 payments
  5. Education $4,000 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. eCoin Device Kit $276,474 64 payments
  2. Solyx SIS System $14,836 17 payments
  3. Da Vinci Surgical System $4,000 1 payment
  4. ALTIS $1,343 6 payments
  5. Desara $257 4 payments
  6. MI CANCER SEEK $238 2 payments
  7. Axonics $207 10 payments
  8. Axonics r-SNM System $190 6 payments
  9. Veozah $169 6 payments
  10. TruFreeze $168 1 payment
  11. Other $748 24 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

1,131

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 65

Drug cost

$134,961

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: $3,585

Branded share of claims

55.9%

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 25.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 254 $122,047
Mirabegron Er Mirabegron Brand 17 $5,799
Estradiol Generic 60 $3,427
Oxybutynin Chloride Er Oxybutynin Chloride Brand 134 $1,432
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 65 $932
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 141 $393
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 200 $249
Solifenacin Succinate Generic 13 $195
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 18 $183
Meloxicam Generic 184 $172

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 24,311 Part D prescribers listed as Obstetrics & Gynecology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$57,307

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

93

Average age 73

Services billed

293

93 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 38%
Depression 26%
Osteoporosis 20%
Cancer 19%
COPD 17%
Chronic kidney disease 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $39
$39 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

148 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record