Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bianca Weinstock Guttman

Neurology Buffalo, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1710957501 CMS profile 305262

100 High St, Buffalo, NY 14203

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$287,551

295 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$18,796

Paid to them · 24 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,135,418 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Bianca Weinstock Guttman of Buffalo, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $287,551 across 295 general payments and $18,796 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,135,418 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,818 9
2024 General $2,228 5
2024 Research $1,081 1
2023 General $28,229 24
2023 Research $1,006 1
2022 General $31,417 47
2022 Research $5,747 7
2021 General $36,265 24
2021 Research $5,292 4
2020 General $68,433 44
2020 Research $4,108 7
2019 General $117,161 142
2019 Research $1,562 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bianca Weinstock Guttman
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bianca Weinstock Guttman were reported at $3,818. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Bianca Weinstock Guttman Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $117,161 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $68,433 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $36,265 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $31,417 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $28,229 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $2,228 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $3,818 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $121,845 117 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $49,341 52 payments
  3. Horizon Therapeutics plc $18,323 19 payments
  4. Genentech USA, Inc. $13,132 20 payments
  5. Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. $11,642 6 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $11,577 10 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $7,895 16 payments
  8. Mylan Specialty L.P. $7,860 4 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $7,700 2 payments
  10. Merck KGaA $5,745 2 payments
  11. Other $32,491 47 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $140,533 46 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $107,265 46 payments
  3. Honoraria $16,900 6 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $15,568 51 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $7,036 127 payments
  6. Education $170 18 payments
  7. Gift $79 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TECFIDERA $48,042 34 payments
  2. VUMERITY $29,755 23 payments
  3. OCREVUS $20,052 31 payments
  4. UPLIZNA $18,323 19 payments
  5. TYSABRI $17,201 18 payments
  6. Mavenclad $9,464 21 payments
  7. Rebif $9,462 7 payments
  8. Evobrutinib $7,685 2 payments
  9. PLEGRIDY $7,497 16 payments
  10. Epidiolex $6,373 4 payments
  11. Other $18,146 36 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $13,712 17 payments
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $5,084 7 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

2,232

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$3,588,742

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

34.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 96 $833,731
Avonex (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 65 $593,905
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 43 $402,207
Rebif Rebidose Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 26 $290,391
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 31 $263,858
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 19 $175,541
Teriflunomide Generic 101 $156,321
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 68 $149,040
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 54 $121,605
Glatopa Glatiramer Acetate Brand 21 $105,897

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$462,743

Of which drugs: $434,545

Medicare patients

117

Average age 65

Services billed

23,850

89 women, 28 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 42%
Depression 37%
Osteoporosis 26%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
COPD 14%
Ischemic heart disease 13%
Diabetes 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 21 6,070 $1,377
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 17 41 $27

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

319 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record