Who Paid My Doc
Beth Loessin
Nurse Practitioner, Family Columbus, OH Nurse Practitioner
NPI 1013519404 CMS profile 11109278
3705 Olentangy River Rd, Ste 100, Columbus, OH 43214
General payments
$33,552
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Beth Loessin of Columbus, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,552 across 180 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $16,008 | 51 | |
| 2024 | General | $6,351 | 35 | |
| 2023 | General | $9,381 | 71 | |
| 2022 | General | $1,685 | 19 | |
| 2021 | General | $127 | 4 |
Beside peers
- Beth Loessin
- Nurse Practitioner, Family median
- Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Beth Loessin were reported at $16,008. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.
Show as a table
| Year | Beth Loessin | Nurse Practitioner, Family median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $39 | $18–$91 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $32 | $17–$76 | $114 |
| 2021 | $127 | $124 | $35–$379 | $132 |
| 2022 | $1,685 | $141 | $44–$430 | $149 |
| 2023 | $9,381 | $154 | $49–$476 | $160 |
| 2024 | $6,351 | $165 | $51–$504 | $164 |
| 2025 | $16,008 | $168 | $53–$521 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugsPart D claims
601
Drug cost
$256,308
Branded share of claims
60.2%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliquis Apixaban | Brand | 251 | $186,739 | |
| Xarelto Rivaroxaban | Brand | 90 | $65,664 | |
| Flecainide Acetate | Generic | 45 | $1,931 | |
| Metoprolol Succinate | Generic | 94 | $811 | |
| Amiodarone Hcl | Generic | 53 | $809 | |
| Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl | Brand | 21 | $185 | |
| Metoprolol Tartrate | Generic | 35 | $131 | |
| Pantoprazole Sodium | Generic | 12 | $38 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$24,174
Medicare patients
276
Services billed
302
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 75% | |
| Arthritis | 50% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 46% | |
| Heart failure | 37% | |
| Diabetes | 32% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 26% | |
| COPD | 20% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Payments and prescribing
3 products · payments 2024Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Product | Paid by | Related payments | Part D claims | Part B services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELIQUIS |
|
$73 | 251 | — |
| XARELTO |
|
$37 | 90 | — |
| VYNDAQEL |
|
$16 | — | — |
A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.
Records
180 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Ohio
Leigh Ann Pansch
Nurse Practitioner, Family · Dayton, OH
Natalie Bellini
Nurse Practitioner, Family · Mayfield Heights, OH
Kaitlyn Lovett
Nurse Practitioner, Family · Montgomery, OH
Amy Ross
Nurse Practitioner, Family · Dayton, OH
Renee Ott
Nurse Practitioner, Family · Sandusky, OH
Megan Miller
Nurse Practitioner, Family · Springfield, OH
Related records
Nurse Practitioner, Family in Ohio
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Nurse Practitioner, Family
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Ohio
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.