Who Paid My Doc
Beth Foreman
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Columbus, OH Doctor of Osteopathy
NPI 1508109190 CMS profile 1739785
6100 N Hamilton Rd, Columbus, OH 43081
General payments
$27,964
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2020, Beth Foreman of Columbus, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,964 across 7 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 72nd percentile of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
2 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | General | $27,000 | 1 | |
| 2019 | General | $964 | 6 |
Beside peers
- Beth Foreman
- Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology median
- Middle half of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Beth Foreman were reported at $0. Among 967 Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,024 and the middle half received between $289 and $6,890.
Show as a table
| Year | Beth Foreman | Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $964 | $863 | $224–$4,562 | $163 |
| 2020 | $27,000 | $452 | $122–$3,992 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $550 | $159–$3,571 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $729 | $221–$4,357 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $1,002 | $309–$5,827 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $931 | $273–$5,204 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $1,024 | $289–$6,890 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugsPart D claims
1,168
Drug cost
$217,529
Branded share of claims
21.1%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliquis Apixaban | Brand | 83 | $76,187 | |
| Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan | Brand | 61 | $71,493 | |
| Jardiance Empagliflozin | Brand | 22 | $39,081 | |
| Xarelto Rivaroxaban | Brand | 13 | $13,703 | |
| Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol | Brand | 11 | $7,408 | |
| Metoprolol Succinate | Generic | 103 | $1,804 | |
| Rosuvastatin Calcium | Generic | 88 | $1,204 | |
| Atorvastatin Calcium | Generic | 125 | $795 | |
| Ezetimibe | Generic | 44 | $703 | |
| Eplerenone | Generic | 12 | $702 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 800 Part D prescribers listed as Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$137,266
Medicare patients
907
Services billed
2,192
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 52% | |
| Arthritis | 50% | |
| Heart failure | 44% | |
| Diabetes | 40% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 40% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 38% | |
| Depression | 30% |
| Drug given in the clinic | Where | Patients | Services | Paid by Medicare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection, perflutren lipid microspheres, per ml Q9957 | Office | 70 | 140 | $4,479 |
| Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 | Office | 52 | 208 | $1,077 |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
7 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology in Ohio
William Abraham
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology · Columbus, OH
Rami Kahwash
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology · Columbus, OH
Eugene Chung
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology · Cincinnati, OH
Kenneth Varian
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology · Akron, OH
Ankit Bhatia
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology · Cincinnati, OH
Rachel Garcia
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology · Cincinnati, OH
Related records
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology in Ohio
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Ohio
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.