Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Beth Ernst

Obstetrics Kearney, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1225112014 CMS profile 146075

211 West 33Rd Street, Kearney, NE 68845

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,792

237 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Beth Ernst of Kearney, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,792 across 237 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Obstetrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $185 11
2024 General $600 20
2023 General $442 32
2022 General $449 28
2021 General $532 42
2020 General $472 22
2019 General $1,112 82

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Beth Ernst
  • Obstetrics median
  • Middle half of Obstetrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Beth Ernst were reported at $185. Among 649 Obstetrics profiles paid that year, the median was $181 and the middle half received between $61 and $424.

Show as a table
Year Beth Ernst Obstetrics median Middle half National median
2019 $1,112 $177 $60–$381 $163
2020 $472 $92 $35–$201 $114
2021 $532 $125 $40–$351 $132
2022 $449 $186 $65–$448 $149
2023 $442 $183 $61–$451 $160
2024 $600 $176 $62–$406 $164
2025 $185 $181 $61–$424 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $619 47 payments
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $383 23 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $330 23 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $322 5 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $298 21 payments
  6. Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. $250 1 payment
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $206 21 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $201 22 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $184 12 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $148 10 payments
  11. Other $852 52 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,792 237 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XARELTO $383 23 payments
  2. SYMBICORT $298 3 payments
  3. FARXIGA $297 3 payments
  4. INVOKANA $257 20 payments
  5. VOWST $250 1 payment
  6. Ozempic $236 17 payments
  7. Repatha $205 14 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $186 19 payments
  9. ENTRESTO $186 21 payments
  10. BYDUREON $178 1 payment
  11. Other $3,634 231 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 124 drugs

Part D claims

6,736

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$597,641

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20.5%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 144 $95,890
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 63 $66,098
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 53 $65,462
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 74 $56,064
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 33 $55,851
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 17 $23,180
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 23 $22,026
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 35 $18,832
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 32 $17,211
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 18 $16,909

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 124 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 73 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$187,762

Of which drugs: $105,153

Medicare patients

255

Average age 75

Services billed

16,736

220 women, 35 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 42%
Osteoporosis 28%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 23%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Heart failure 16%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 37 3,660 $73,759
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 56 64 $9,000
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 71 71 $5,809
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 12 12 $3,487

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $42
$42 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $36
$36 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $31
$31 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $29
$29 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $15
$15 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

237 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Obstetrics in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record