Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Beric Berlioz

Interventional Pain Medicine Jacksonville, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1093240061 CMS profile 4215031

7207 Golden Wings Rd Ste 100, Jacksonville, FL 32244

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,501

225 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Beric Berlioz of Jacksonville, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,501 across 225 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $984 44
2024 General $1,358 75
2023 General $2,821 77
2022 General $1,036 25
2021 General $10,302 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Beric Berlioz
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Beric Berlioz were reported at $984. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Beric Berlioz Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $0 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $10,302 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $1,036 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $2,821 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $1,358 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $984 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $10,838 10 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,545 37 payments
  3. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $660 47 payments
  4. Nevro Corp. $431 7 payments
  5. Painteq LLC $415 8 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $368 29 payments
  7. Stryker Corporation $308 4 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $303 13 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $248 8 payments
  10. TerSera Therapeutics LLC $208 9 payments
  11. Other $1,176 53 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Grant $10,000 1 payment
  2. Food and Beverage $5,528 217 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $747 5 payments
  4. Education $226 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. SYNCHROMED $10,000 1 payment
  2. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $817 7 payments
  3. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $636 17 payments
  4. XTAMPZA $451 32 payments
  5. PAINTEQ $415 8 payments
  6. RELISTOR $368 29 payments
  7. Omnia $348 4 payments
  8. UBRELVY $218 9 payments
  9. BELBUCA $209 15 payments
  10. Prialt $208 9 payments
  11. Other $3,052 119 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

9,099

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$615,746

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

61.2%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 355 $165,442
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 1,900 $80,791
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 2,120 $69,859
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 111 $69,699
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 46 $30,834
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 1,628 $30,204
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 18 $28,327
Fentanyl Generic 227 $24,045
Nucynta Er Tapentadol Hcl Brand 20 $23,477
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 740 $20,804

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$315,067

Of which drugs: $76

Medicare patients

571

Average age 72

Services billed

3,938

362 women, 209 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 41%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
COPD 28%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 32 40 $31
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 28 32 $3

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $190
$190 355 —
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $172
$172 — —
Prialt
  • TerSera Therapeutics LLC $126
$126 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $98
$98 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $53
$53 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

225 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record