Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Benjamin Levinson

Internal Medicine Irmo, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1346208865 CMS profile 332464

7182 Woodrow St Ste 200, Irmo, SC 29063

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,222

807 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Benjamin Levinson of Irmo, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,222 across 807 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,995 109
2024 General $1,902 120
2023 General $1,489 107
2022 General $2,116 139
2021 General $1,949 149
2020 General $1,428 97
2019 General $1,343 86

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Benjamin Levinson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Benjamin Levinson were reported at $1,995. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Benjamin Levinson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,343 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,428 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,949 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,116 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,489 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,902 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,995 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,538 148 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,438 72 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $839 44 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $647 53 payments
  5. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $546 30 payments
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $528 38 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $498 28 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $487 34 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $454 31 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $426 31 payments
  11. Other $4,819 298 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,012 803 payments
  2. Education $210 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,129 50 payments
  2. UBRELVY $556 40 payments
  3. REXULTI $546 30 payments
  4. Ozempic $537 28 payments
  5. Kerendia $498 28 payments
  6. XIFAXAN $488 34 payments
  7. Vascepa $463 33 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $445 25 payments
  9. LINZESS $372 46 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $349 27 payments
  11. Other $9,840 694 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 241 drugs

Part D claims

16,222

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,018,491

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 186 $257,820
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 205 $179,162
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 128 $150,890
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 149 $140,738
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 14 $135,460
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 113 $129,840
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 32 $93,741
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 53 $63,645
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 47 $44,174
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 28 $40,171

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 241 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 91 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$317,047

Of which drugs: $12,642

Medicare patients

714

Average age 74

Services billed

6,670

404 women, 310 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 26%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Heart failure 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 60 104 $95

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
$278 — —
FARXIGA
$156 149 —
AIRSUPRA
$99 — —
Xelstrym
$92 — —
MOUNJARO
$74 186 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

807 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record